Potential flashpoint

Published March 14, 2023

AS a recent American intelligence assessment affirms, the subcontinent remains a major potential flashpoint for conflict, with Kashmir and militancy being the primary factors that may spark a conflagration. However, this does not have to be a fait accompli. As the recent diplomatic breakthrough between Saudi Arabia and Iran — brokered by China — shows, even the most intractable foreign relationships can be managed positively if the parties are willing to bury the hatchet, and if non-aligned actors help prepare the groundwork for peace. As mentioned in the Annual Threat Assessment of the US Intelligence Community, though the ceasefire along the LoC is holding, India is likely to respond with military force “to perceived or real Pakistani provocations” while “unrest in [held] Kashmir or a militant attack in India” are listed as potential flashpoints for a conflict. While the report may overplay Pakistan’s alleged support for cross-border militancy, and underplay India’s belligerence towards Pakistan, there can be little argument with the fact that the Kashmir dispute, and the toxic Pakistan-India relationship, can transform into a conflict. The report also seemingly reinforces former US secretary of state Mike Pompeo’s claim earlier this year that Islamabad and New Delhi came close to a nuclear exchange in 2019 following the Balakot episode after both sides believed the other was about to deploy its nuclear assets.

Managing this difficult relationship is demanding, but not impossible. Ideally, Pakistan and India should strike a deal in which the interests of both are protected. As India’s late envoy to Pakistan Satinder Lambah recalled in his book, a meticulously discussed peace pact is ready and all it needs is approval from both capitals. It may be useful to revive this document and use it as the base for discussions. Immediate steps by the two states can include restoring diplomatic missions to full strength, and easing the torturous visa process for divided families. But serious dialogue can only begin when a new government takes power in Pakistan, and a fresh administration takes the reins after India’s elections next year. In the meantime, away from the public glare, backchannel talks can always take place based on the China-Saudi-Iran model. For this to succeed, both countries will need to agree on a neutral interlocutor with international standing to help broker a deal. Once significant progress has been made, the deal can be made public.

Published in Dawn, March 14th, 2023

Opinion

Editorial

Palestine MPC
Updated 09 Oct, 2024

Palestine MPC

It's a matter of concern that PTI did not attend the Palestine MPC. Political differences should be put aside when showing solidarity with Palestine.
A welcome reform
09 Oct, 2024

A welcome reform

THE Punjab government’s decision to abolish the corruption-ridden and inefficient food department, and replace it...
Water paradox
09 Oct, 2024

Water paradox

A FULLY fledged water crisis is unfolding across the world, with 2023 recorded as the driest year for rivers in over...
Terrorism upsurge
Updated 08 Oct, 2024

Terrorism upsurge

The state cannot afford major security lapses. It may well be that the Chinese nationals were targeted to sabotage SCO event.
Ban hammer
08 Oct, 2024

Ban hammer

THE decision to ban the PTM under the Anti-Terrorism Act is yet another ill-advised move by the state. Although the...
Water tensions
08 Oct, 2024

Water tensions

THE unresolved tensions over Indus water distribution under the 1991 Water Apportionment Accord demand a revision of...