Fawad Chaudhry remanded in 14-day judicial custody, sent to Adiala Jail

Published January 27, 2023
PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry gestures as police officials escort him after a hearing at a court in Islamabad on Jan 27. — AFP
PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry gestures as police officials escort him after a hearing at a court in Islamabad on Jan 27. — AFP
PTI Senior Vice President Fawad Chaudhry being escorted out of the district and sessions court in Islamabad. — Screengrab
PTI Senior Vice President Fawad Chaudhry being escorted out of the district and sessions court in Islamabad. — Screengrab
PTI Senior Vice President Fawad Chaudhry in the Islamabad district and sessions court on January 27. — Twitter/PTIofficial
PTI Senior Vice President Fawad Chaudhry in the Islamabad district and sessions court on January 27. — Twitter/PTIofficial
Frontier Corps personnel stand outside the district and sessions court in Islamabad. — Screengrab
Frontier Corps personnel stand outside the district and sessions court in Islamabad. — Screengrab

An Islamabad district and sessions court on Friday sent PTI leader Fawad Chaudhry to Adiala jail on a 14-day judicial remand in a case over alleged incitement of violence against a constitutional institution.

The court on Wednesday night had granted police an initial two-day physical remand of Fawad, hours after he was arrested.

The former information minister was taken into custody after a first information report (FIR) against him was registered at Islamabad’s Kohsar police station by an official of the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for “threatening” the electoral body’s members and their families.

The ECP’s plea for an extension to Fawad’s physical remand was heard in the courtroom of Judge Raja Waqas Ahmed today.

At the onset of the hearing, the election commission’s lawyer Saad Hassan, the prosecutor in the case, informed the court that the PTI leader’s voice matching had been completed. He requested an extension in remand, saying that Fawad had to be taken to Lahore for a photogrammetric test.

The prosecutor contended before the court that the former federal minister was inciting hatred against a constitutional institution. “Fawad is trying to create unrest,” he said. “The statement threatens the lives of the election commission’s workers.”

The ECP lawyer argued that an extension to the PTI leader’s remand was imperative to carry out further investigation in the case. He cited the Shehbaz Gill case as an example.

“A day had already passed when the remand was approved at 12am,” the investigation officer said. “Technically [speaking] we just got his remand for a day and we want an extension to it.”

The ECP lawyer told the court that Fawad’s statement was available on record, adding that the PTI leader had also acknowledged his speech. “No one can object the speech. “The accused has accepted his statement.”

He added that the election commission’s employees were told that they do “the work of a clerk”. “We were threatened that they (PTI supporters) will reach our homes.”

At this, Fawad’s counsel Babar Awan accused the election commission of colluding with the government against PTI. “We are being blamed and pressured.”

The ECP lawyer responded that Fawad was a senior politician but “no one is above the law”. He told the court that it was mandatory to search the PTI leader’s home. “It is important to recover Fawad’s laptop and mobile phone in his presence”.

“Fawad’s statement is not one person’s statement but an entire group’s narrative,” the ECP lawyer said. “A campaign has not only been launched against the ECP but also the top officials of the election commission.”

Meanwhile, Awan questioned why Fawad’s face was covered by the police following his arrest. “Even Kulbushan Yadav’s face was not covered [after arrest] so why was Fawad’s face covered with a white cloth,” he said, adding that anti-terrorist force had been deployed around the PTI leader.

Awan said that the election commission’s secretary was a “servant of his political masters”, and wondered why the prosecution was irked by the use of the word “clerk”.

Awan disagreed with the need for a further remand of his client, saying: “The video of Fawad’s statement is available. What further investigation needs to be carried out?”

Following the conclusion of the arguments, the judge approved Fawad’s request to have his handcuffs removed inside the court and also reserved its verdict on the issue of remand extension.

Later, in its verdict, the court sent Fawad to judicial remand instead of physical remand.

Separately, a bail application was filed by Fawad on the argument that the case against him was based on “mala fide intention” and “ulterior motives”, and filed “only to harass, pressurise (sic) and blackmail” him.

It adds that the allegations leveled in the FIR were “absolutely false, frivolous and baseless”. “The petitioner was arrested illegally, unlawfully and without any justification in negation to the law and constitutional rights of the petitioner.”

However, Judge Ahmed refused to conduct the hearing of Fawad’s bail plea. “I do not have jurisdiction over the bail application,” he said, suggesting that it be referred to the relevant forum.

Subsequently, PTI leaders took the bail application to Judge Tahir Mehmood’s courtroom, who then relayed it to Additional Sessions Judge Faizan Haider Gillani. The hearing was adjourned till tomorrow.

Fawad arrives at court amid tight security

Ahead of the hearing, Heavy contingents of Frontier Corps personnel and police were deployed outside the court. Some PTI workers also clashed with policemen.

Media personnel, former human rights minister Shireen Mazari and ex-SAPM Zulfi Bukhari among other PTI leaders were restrained by police from going inside the courtroom.

“Are we terrorists that we are not allowed to go inside the court?” Mazari remarked while talking to the media. “Are you taking revenge from us?”

Allegations against Fawad

A first information report was registered against the PTI leader at the Kohsar police station in Islamabad on the complaint of Secretary of the Election Commission Umar Hameed.

The complaint — a copy of which is available with Dawn.com — invokes sections 153-A (promotion of enmity between groups), 506 (criminal intimidation), 505 (statement conducing to public mischief), and 124-A (sedition) of the Pakistan Penal Code at Islamabad’s Kohsar Police Station.

It stated that Fawad, in a speech outside PTI Chairman Imran Khan’s house, threatened the ECP and said that “those who become part of the caretaker government [in Punjab] will be pursued until they are punished”.

Later in a tweet, the Islamabad police said that Fawad tried to “incite violence against a constitutional institution” and “inflame the sentiments of the people”. It added that the case will be processed as per the law.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.