Arafat continues battle for peace

Published January 29, 2002

RAMALLAH: Yasser Arafat is still in touch with kings and presidents, still battling for peace. Nearing midnight on Wednesday, sitting behind a desk laden with documents bulkily gathered into clear plastic folders, the Palestinian Authority president insisted that he remains committed to a cease-fire with the Israelis. “Definitely. I am repeating it day by night,” he says.

In Arafat’s deep, rich, occasionally melodious voice, the last phrase sings. Near the end of an interview with two European newspapers, he repeats that he is “in permanent contact with the whole world.”

He has been forced to accept an end to his travels but rejects any notion that his role is diminished. It is important, as Arafat says at least eight times in the course of an hour, “not to forget.” Not to forget that the Palestinian leader is a general who signed internationally lauded peace agreements and who now abjures violence. Not to forget Israel’s illegal occupation of Palestinian lands. And not to forget that Yasser Arafat is still the man.

During the Palestinian leader’s long career, one achievement stands above all. Through a combination of relentless diplomacy and calculated violence, he has made sure that the Palestinian cause remains thoroughly unforgotten.

Arafat - once the world’s most famous frequent flyer and a man who spent years rarely sleeping in the same bed two nights in a row, mainly to avoid Israeli assassination - is now a homebody of sorts.

Perhaps officebody might be a better way to put it. Arafat’s wife and daughter have been in Europe for months, ever since Israeli munitions struck Arafat’s compound in the Gaza Strip. Arafat’s home is his office.

He keeps his aides and advisers close at hand and relishes visitors from the capitals he used to frequent. A recent highlight: a meeting with British Prime Minister Tony Blair. On deck for on Friday: a Russian envoy. There is always the phone. On Wednesday, says Abu Radeineh, “two Arab presidents were on the line. They call the president.”

Reporters, at least, are eager to see him. Obtaining an interview now poses many fewer scheduling challenges. His message remains constant. The Arafat logic goes like this. A decade ago, Arafat renounced armed struggle and made peace. The international community applauded.

Amid the current violence, Arafat has been declaring cease-fires and attempting to enforce them. The Israelis respond with “military escalations.” So it is up to the international community to step in, to pressure the Israelis, to send in neutral observers. “They have to arrive very soon,” he says with urgency.

To Arafat’s open-faced, hands-spread-wide incomprehension, the world does not put two and two together and come up with four in the same way he does. “There is a problem,” he says. “No doubt.”

In early January in the Red Sea, the Israelis seized a ship laden with mainly Iranian arms and other supplies that was captained and partially crewed by Palestinians. Israel asserts that Arafat ordered the weapons.

In the interview, Arafat argues that the ship would never have made it through the Suez Canal without Egypt discovering its cargo; that the Palestinians have no suitable harbour in the Gaza Strip, the ship’s alleged destination; that the Israeli Navy blankets the roughly 12 miles of Gaza coastline that is not occupied by Israeli settlements. “I don’t need to ask the Iranians to give me weapons,” he says finally. “When we returned back here, we returned with our arms, officially.”

Diplomats say that US officials remain unconvinced by Arafat’s denials. If the Americans were to decide to back away from him, Arafat would be one step closer to irrelevant. The one country thought capable of pressuring Israel might be unwilling to listen to him, leaving the Israelis freer to try to destabilize his regime. As it is, the Palestinian rumour circuit is full of mutterings about those who are positioning themselves to replace him.

Throughout the interview, Abu Radeineh helps Arafat to find the right word, understand questions, and fill in details. On the subject of the attacks, which killed eight Israelis during the past week, he says the Fatah militants acted “on a personal level without orders from the leadership.” “Definitely,” Arafat adds.

Karmi’s killing was the beginning of the end of the longest lull in the violence since it began 15 months ago, and serves Arafat’s argument that Israel responds to his cease-fire efforts with actions that provoke more violence. The lull began Dec. 16, following Arafat’s televised call for an end to “all armed actions.”—Dawn/LATS Service (c) Christian Science Monitor.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...