Bold decisions

Published January 17, 2022

IT is a double blow within a matter of days. The Islamabad High Court’s order last week to demolish a navy golf course in the capital has come on the heels of the same court ordering two Pakistan Navy projects, including farmhouses and a sailing club to be similarly demolished. These are bold and historic decisions in that they hold powerful entities accountable for abusing their authority and violating land use laws.

In the more recent golf course case, the court found it had illegally been built in a protected park area and that the navy had encroached upon state land without lawful authority and jurisdiction. It has ordered the site sealed and its possession handed over to CDA and the Islamabad Wildlife Management Board. Unless it can be utilised for an environmentally-friendly activity, the golf course is to be demolished within four weeks. The court also ordered the CDA chairman to probe the construction of Monal and other restaurants located on national park land.

Read: 'Are wedding halls and cinemas for defence?' CJP grills govt official over military land's commerical use

If these orders are implemented, it will send an important message to privileged segments of society. Too often, we have seen similar directives about the illegal use of land in Karachi, in which wedding halls and shopping malls have been set up on land allotted for specific military use. But these orders are not complied with and there is no follow-through. Why is it that compliance is only ensured where middle- and lower-income classes are affected?

In the recent Nasla Tower case, for instance, the apex court had expressed its displeasure with the Karachi commissioner for not completing the demolition process in time. To cite another example, when it came to razing Empress Market shops, also ordered by the apex court, the authorities moved with alacrity. The reality is that the rules are different for those that have influence and connections, as compared to those that do not.

In cases where the owners and financiers of illegally constructed property and recreation projects are powerful, court orders are ignored, delayed or simply forgotten. But this leeway is not extended to projects where ‘ordinary’ members of the populace have a stake. It is a sorry reflection of the authorities’ inability or lack of willingness to implement court orders that ruffle elite feathers. The IHC directive to demolish the navy projects is a test case for the Islamabad administration to prove if a ‘naya’ Pakistan is at all possible.

Published in Dawn, January 17th, 2022

Opinion

Editorial

Afghan turbulence
19 Mar, 2024

Afghan turbulence

RELATIONS between the newly formed government and Afghanistan’s de facto Taliban rulers have begun on an...
In disarray
19 Mar, 2024

In disarray

IT is clear that there is some bad blood within the PTI’s ranks. Ever since the PTI lost a key battle over ...
Festering wound
19 Mar, 2024

Festering wound

PROTESTS unfolded once more in Gwadar, this time against the alleged enforced disappearances of two young men, who...
Defining extremism
Updated 18 Mar, 2024

Defining extremism

Redefining extremism may well be the first step to clamping down on advocacy for Palestine.
Climate in focus
18 Mar, 2024

Climate in focus

IN a welcome order by the Supreme Court, the new government has been tasked with providing a report on actions taken...
Growing rabies concern
18 Mar, 2024

Growing rabies concern

DOG-BITE is an old problem in Pakistan. Amid a surfeit of public health challenges, rabies now seems poised to ...