Supreme Court to take up PTM leader Ali Wazir’s bail plea today

Published November 30, 2021
MNA Ali Wazir was arrested on charges of making incendiary speeches against state institutions at a public meeting in Karachi on December 6 last year. — Photo via Twitter/File
MNA Ali Wazir was arrested on charges of making incendiary speeches against state institutions at a public meeting in Karachi on December 6 last year. — Photo via Twitter/File

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court bench, which had transferred the bail plea of Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) leader Mohammad Ali Wazir to another bench, will now hear the same appeal on Tuesday (today).

Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, who headed the three-judge bench which ordered the transfer, observed on Monday that the case was inadvertently fixed for hearing before a different bench.

Under the previous schedule, the appeal was due for hearing by a bench headed by Justice Umar Ata Bandial on Monday.

A notice issued by the Supreme Court office stated that the case fixed before the three-judge bench under Justice Bandial had been delisted because Justice Sajjad Ali Shah, a member of the bench, was not available for hearing.

Mohsin Dawar, another PTM leader and member of the National Assembly, appeared before the bench of Justice Sardar Tariq Masood on Monday and was told that the case was fixed before a different bench by mistake.

Mohsin Dawar told the judge that Salahuddin Khan Gandapur, the counsel for Ali Wazir, was out of Islamabad too. The hearing was adjourned to Tuesday on the PTM chief’s request.

Ali Wazir, an MNA, was arrested on charges of making incendiary speeches against state institutions at a public meeting in Karachi on December 6 last year. The first information report (FIR) against him was lodged at Sohrab Goth police station the same day.

The MNA pleaded with the apex court to set aside the Sindh High Court order since it was not sustainable under the law, adding that he was innocent and did not commit the offence mentioned in the FIR.

Furthermore, the petitioner argued, the SHC and the Anti- Terrorism Court (ATC) “failed to appreciate that witnesses named in the FIR were not independent witnesses. They were police personnel and therefore interested witnesses”.

The petition recalled that the FIR did not name any independent witness from the area where the public meeting was held. “It won’t be wrong to assume that the petitioner (Ali Wazir) has been implicated in a false case.”

The petitioner stated further that he had no criminal history and no cases were pending against him. There was no independent evidence to connect the appellant with the alleged offences of criminal conspiracy, waging war against the state, assaulting the president, the governor, promoting enmity between linguistic groups and spreading rumours with the intent to incite mutiny.

Published in Dawn, November 30th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

The establishment pivot
18 Jan, 2022

The establishment pivot

It is a sad reality that the power matrix continues to revolve around the establishment.
18 Jan, 2022

Remittances growth

THE hefty growth in remittances from Pakistanis living abroad continues to defy forecasts to the contrary. New State...
18 Jan, 2022

China-Iran deal

THE China-Iran strategic deal that has recently taken effect is more than just a long-term bilateral agreement...
Security policy unveiled
Updated 17 Jan, 2022

Security policy unveiled

PAKISTAN’S freshly unveiled National Security Policy has broadened the traditional concept and included economic...
Bold decisions
Updated 17 Jan, 2022

Bold decisions

IT is a double blow within a matter of days. The Islamabad High Court’s order last week to demolish a navy golf...
17 Jan, 2022

Rohingya camp blaze

A HUGE blaze in a refugee camp housing members of the Rohingya community in Bangladesh last week has left up to ...