RAUL Prebisch, former executive secretary of the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), gained recognition due to his work on dependency theory for his groundbreaking Prebisch-Singer hypothesis.

Contrary to the traditional viewpoint on dependency theory that underdevelopment in the developing world is caused by neoliberal economic policies that rest at the resources of peripheral regions, he opined that the main reason behind this underdevelopment is neither neoliberalism nor neocolonialism.

Instead, it is the lack of industrialisation and a prior focus on the doctrine of economic dualism. He argued that only those states have a tendency to survive in the market that have a vibrant economy.

On the other hand, Fernando Henrique Cardoso, a former Brazilian president, and a renowned scholar of sociology, economy and political science, also developed a thesis on dependency theory, which is deemed an extension of the Prebisch-Singer hypothesis.

While addressing the problem of the developing countries and why they fail in building their own industries, as Prebisch had asserted, Cardoso concluded that three classes in any society do not let the nation as a whole to walk on the path to success.

The foremost is the class of landed elite whose raw products are being exported outside and are key in policy development in any country, as 60 per cent of public representatives comprise such people.

Then there are the national bourgeois; the producers of consumer products, such as sugar, wheat and rice. They believe that opening the market to global competition might cause damage to their business with the arrival of low-priced better products. Hence, they are against both industries and the open market.

The military enterprises are the third class which, according to Cardoso, does not let industries get installed in any developing country.

They in the period of time have developed a corporation which is hand-in-glove with the landed elite and the national bourgeois. As such, their interests are at stake with such development.

We, in Pakistan, will do well to see if we find some traces of similarity between our reality and the theorisation cited above. After all, we happen to be a developing country.

Sultan ul Arifeen
Gujranwala

Published in Dawn, October 7th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Ties with Tehran
Updated 24 Apr, 2024

Ties with Tehran

Tomorrow, if ties between Washington and Beijing nosedive, and the US asks Pakistan to reconsider CPEC, will we comply?
Working together
24 Apr, 2024

Working together

PAKISTAN’S democracy seems adrift, and no one understands this better than our politicians. The system has gone...
Farmers’ anxiety
24 Apr, 2024

Farmers’ anxiety

WHEAT prices in Punjab have plummeted far below the minimum support price owing to a bumper harvest, reckless...
By-election trends
Updated 23 Apr, 2024

By-election trends

Unless the culture of violence and rigging is rooted out, the credibility of the electoral process in Pakistan will continue to remain under a cloud.
Privatising PIA
23 Apr, 2024

Privatising PIA

FINANCE Minister Muhammad Aurangzeb’s reaffirmation that the process of disinvestment of the loss-making national...
Suffering in captivity
23 Apr, 2024

Suffering in captivity

YET another animal — a lioness — is critically ill at the Karachi Zoo. The feline, emaciated and barely able to...