Voting machine referendum plea dismissed

Published September 16, 2021
A file photo of the Islamabad High Court. — Photo courtesy IHC website/File
A file photo of the Islamabad High Court. — Photo courtesy IHC website/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) on Wednesday dismissed a petition seeking referendum on the introduction of electronic voting machines in the next general elections.

The court, however, said it expected that parliament in the light of objections raised by the Election Commission of Pakistan would legislate in this matter.

Chief Justice Athar Minallah observed that parliament and the ECP would take a decision to ensure fair and transparent elections and the IHC was not the appropriate forum to seek the same relief.

“This court also has no reason to doubt that the concerns and objections raised by the Election Commission would not be taken into consideration by the parliament whenever the latter considers the proposed legislation relating to conduct of elections through the electronic voting machines,” he observed.

IHC expects parliament to legislate on the matter in light of ECP’s objections

In his petition, Advocate Tariq Asad had sought a directive for the ECP to apprise the court of the objections raised against the holding of next general elections through voting machi­nes. He also requested the court to suggest the federal government to hold a referendum on the use of voting mach­ines for holding general elections.

As the petitioner had raised concerns over political turmoil due to federal government’s insistence on introducing voting machines, the court was of the opinion that political debate was an integral part of the democratic process. Simultaneously, the court added, it was the duty of every citizen, particularly the political leadership, to ensure that the constitutional forums were respected and political debates/discussions were held in conformity with the established democratic principles of tolerance, respect for dissent and fair play.

The chief justice observed that the high court was not the proper forum for raising concerns associated with political instability, turmoil or controversies.

“The proposal is at its initial stage and that it obviously requires legislation by the parliament for its enforcement. The concerns of the petitioner at this stage are, therefore, premature and thus the grievance is based on mere apprehensions,” the court observed.

The chief justice noted that since parliament was yet to debate the matter, he had no reason to doubt that parliament would not consider all the relevant matters and thereafter decide the issue in the best interest of the people of Pakistan.

Also, the ECP enjoyed the status of a constitutional body established under Article 218 of the Constitution, the chief justice noted. He recalled that Sub Article (3) of Article 218 exclusively provides that it shall be the duty of the ECP to organise and conduct elections and to make such arrangements as were necessary to ensure that the elections were conducted honestly, justly, fairly and in accordance with the law and that corrupt practices were guarded against.

Published in Dawn, September 16th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.