CSS: quota menace

Published October 14, 2020

THE government seems interested in conducting ‘special CSS examinations’ as reiterated by it recently. Apparently it seems the right decision to accommodate the underprivileged candidates of provinces other than Punjab, it is yet to be seen whether it comes under the ambit of the Constitution.

The first question is: how have 188 seats remained ‘vacant’ when CSS examinations are being conducted on an annual basis?

As announced by the government, these seats belong to the non-Punjab CSS candidates and come under the umbrella of ‘quota system’. The quota system has already been termed un-Islamic by the Federal Shariat Court in 1992, and unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Pakistan in 1997. Strangely, it continues to be practised even after 23 years of the landmark judgment.

The quota system was made a temporary part under Article 27 of the Constitution. The Article says: “quota system should not exceed a period of 40 years from the commencing day of the Constitution (1973).” This means quota stands expired in the year 2013. The only option to decide the fate of quota is an act of parliament under Article 27 (iii).

Since 2013, there has been no act of parliament which may extend quota; therefore, it is evident that the federal government, through the establishment division, is conducting these prestigious examinations illegally for the last seven years without any constitutional cover.

As reported by Dawn (Oct 9, 2019), a petition was also filed in the Islamabad High Court by 34 candidates regarding the legality of the quota system. The court is currently hearing the petition.

It is, therefore, not difficult to conclude that not only the quota system is unconstitutional, but the issuance of statements regarding a matter which is already being heard by the high court may also amount to another illegal step being taken in frustration and not rationality.

This may be termed an irrational escape of the government to allocate all 188 seats in a single-step. It may also be an effort of the government to influence the judgment of IHC even before its announcement.

Syed Rameez Naqvi
Attock

Published in Dawn, October 14th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...