Major states snub calls for action as climate summit ends

Published December 16, 2019
Chile's Minister of Environment and COP25 president Carolina Schmidt (R) talks to Brazilian Secretary for National Sovereignty and Citizenship Fabio Mendes Marzano during the closing plenary session of the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in Madrid, on Dec 15. — AFP
Chile's Minister of Environment and COP25 president Carolina Schmidt (R) talks to Brazilian Secretary for National Sovereignty and Citizenship Fabio Mendes Marzano during the closing plenary session of the UN Climate Change Conference COP25 in Madrid, on Dec 15. — AFP

MADRID: A handful of major states resisted pressure on Sunday to ramp up efforts to combat global warming as a UN climate summit ground to a close, angering smaller countries and a growing protest movement that is pushing for emergency action.

The COP25 talks in Madrid were viewed as a test of governments’ collective will to heed the advice of scientists to cut greenhouse gas emissions more rapidly, in order to prevent rising global temperatures from hitting irreversible tipping points.

But the conference, in its concluding draft, endorsed only a declaration on the “urgent need” to close the gap between existing emission pledges and the temperature goals of the landmark 2015 Paris climate agreement — an outcome UN Sec­retary-General Antonio Guterres called “disappointing”.

Many developing countries and campaigners had wanted to see much more explicit language spelling out the importance of countries submitting bolder pledges on emissions as the Paris process enters a crucial implementation phase next year.

Delegates say US, Brazil, China, Australia and Saudi Arabia led resistance to bolder steps

The United States, Brazil, China, Australia and Saudi Arabia led resistance to bolder action, delegates said.

“These talks reflect how disconnected country leaders are from the urgency of the science and the demands of their citizens in the streets,” said Helen Mountford, vice president for climate and economics at the World Resources Institute think-tank. “They need to wake up in 2020.”

The lack of a strong outcome to reinforce the Paris accord raises the stakes for the next climate summit, in Glasgow in November next year. As host, British Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government faces the task of persuading countries to submit more ambitious plans to cut carbon emissions.

The Madrid summit had been due to end at the two-week mark on Friday but ran on for two extra days — a long delay even by the standards of often torturous climate summits.

After final decisions were made, Chile’s environment minister Carolina Schmidt — who served as president of the talks — said she was “of mixed emotions”.

The country had earlier triggered outrage after drafting a version of the text that campaigners complained was so weak it betrayed the spirit of the Paris Agreement.

The process set out in the Paris deal hinges on countries enhancing emission cuts next year.

The final draft did acknowledge the “significant gap” between existing pledges and the temperature goals adopted in 2015. Nevertheless, it was seen as a weak response to the sense of urgency felt by communities around the world afflicted by floods, droughts, wildfires and cyclones that scientists say have become more intense as the Earth rapidly warms up.

Guterres, who opened the talks on Dec 2, said in a statement: “The international community lost an important opportunity to show increased ambition on mitigation, adaptation and finance to tackle the climate crisis.

“We must not give up and I will not give up.”

Delegates drew some consolation from an agreement reached in Brussels last week by the European Union’s 28 member states, except Poland, to reach net zero carbon emissions by 2050, under a “Green Deal” to wean the continent off fossil fuels.

“It seems that EU now needs to be the leader and we want to be and we are going to be and that is what we are doing,” said Krista Mikkonen, Finland’s environment minister and the EU’s representative at the talks.

Published in Dawn, December 16th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.