Military courts

Published March 25, 2019

POLITICAL parties are again thinking of doing away with military courts. They should follow the guidelines (never implemented) suggested in the Liaquat Hussain versus Federation of Pakistan case in 1999 when it disallowed the setting up of military courts.

Had the then and subsequent governments and the superior judiciary implemented these guidelines, the issue would not have arisen now.

The Supreme Court ruling laid down the following guidelines:

(i) Cases relating to terrorism be entrusted to special courts already established or which may be established under the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997.

(ii) Only one case be assigned at a time to a special court and no other case be entrusted to it till judgment is announced in such case;

(iii) The concerned special court should proceed with the case entrusted to it on a day-to-day basis and pronounce judgment within a period of seven days;

(iv) Challan of a case should be submitted to a special court after full preparation and after ensuring that all witnesses will be produced as and when required by the special court;

(v) An appeal arising out of an order/judgment of the Special Court be decided by the appellate forum within a period of seven days from the filing of such appeal;

(vi) Any lapse on the part of the investigating and prosecuting agencies should entail immediate disciplinary action;

(vii) The chief justice of the high court concerned shall nominate one or more high court judges for monitoring and ensuring that the cases/appeals are disposed of in terms of these guidelines;

(viii) That the Chief Justice of Pakistan may nominate one or more judges of the Supreme Court to monitor the implementation of the above guidelines and to ensure that if any petition for leave/or appeal with the leave is filed in the Supreme Court, the same is disposed of without any delay;

(ix) That besides invoking aid of the armed forces in terms of sections 4 and 5 of the ATA, the armed forces assistance can be pressed into service by virtue of Article 245 of the Constitution at all stages including the security of the Presiding Officer, Advocates and witnesses appearing in the cases, minus the process of judicial adjudication as to the guilt and quantum of sentence, till the execution of the sentence.

Babar Ayaz
Karachi

Published in Dawn, March 25th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.