IHC fines officials Rs2m for failure to recover missing person

Published November 20, 2018
The JIT is warned that in case it failed to find the person in 6 months, the PM might dismiss its members from service.— AFP/File
The JIT is warned that in case it failed to find the person in 6 months, the PM might dismiss its members from service.— AFP/File

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court on Monday imposed a fine of Rs2 million on the secretaries defence and interior, inspector general of Islamabad police and members of a joint investigation team (JIT) for their failure to trace a missing person.

Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani of the IHC imposed the fine while disposing of a petition filed by Zainab Zaeem Khan, wife of missing person Abdullah Omar.

Also read: 36 'missing' persons traced in Sept: report

The court set a six-month deadline for the recovery of Omar and directed that in case the JIT failed to find the missing person, the prime minister might dismiss its members from service.

Omar is allegedly involved in the murder of former federal minister for minority affairs Shahbaz Bhatti and Chaudhry Zulfiqar Ali, the Federal Investigation Agency prosecutor in the Benazir Bhutto murder case.

Omar’s counsel Dr Attique Tahir, however, argued that the court had already acquitted the principal accused in the Shahbaz Bhatti murder case and that there was no evidence against his client.

He said the court had imposed a heavy fine on the respondent authorities and the officials who had failed to trace the whereabouts of the missing person might also be dismissed from service under the court order.

He said that besides police authorities, the members of JIT would also face the removal from service in case they failed to recover Omar.

According to him, the JIT comprised the officials from police and intelligence agencies, including the Inter-Services Intelligence, Military Intelligence and Intelligence Bureau.

The petitioner sought the release of her husband who is allegedly under the custody of security agencies. She named the SHO Industrial Area, IGP Islamabad, the interior ministry and an intelligence agency as respondents.

The petitioner requested the court to order the respondents to produce her husband before the court.

She claimed that her husband was injured during a firing incident in Rawalpindi in May 2013 after which he became paralysed and lost his legs. The incident was reported to the Ratta Amral police.

She said her husband was admitted to the Quaid-i-Azam International Hospital, Rawalpindi, when the respondents took him into custody in June 2013.

He remained in their custody till 2015 when he was released on bail by the anti-terrorism court of Islamabad, she added.

However, on June 20, 2015, he was abducted by the officials of security agencies, she alleged. The petitioner said a lawyer, Hammad Dadan, was also accompanying her husband when he was abducted, but the lawyer was later released on a writ petition filed by his father Mumtaz Anwar.

It may be mentioned that the Islamabad police had arrested Omar, an alleged Al Qaeda activist, in June 2013 for his alleged involvement in attacking FIA prosecutor Chaudhry Zulfiqar. Police claimed that Omar got injured when the prosecutor’s guard opened fire on the attackers.

According to police, Omar, who sustained three bullet injuries, reached the Quaid-i-Azam International Hospital and told doctors that he was fired upon by robbers.

Published in Dawn, November 20th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.