A bitter vote

Published October 20, 2018

BETWEEN 118 confirmed — who also served — and 12 rejected US Supreme Court nominations from 1789 to the present, the case of Brett Kavanaugh is not only peculiar but also uncharacteristically extraordinary in American history.

The scale and cause of public protests that prevailed against this nomination have no precedent in US history for such a high level and prestigious Supreme Court nomination. The times, however, have changed and there is a dire need for the process to be re-examined and revisited to make it more apolitical and fair.

Mr Kavanaugh’s nomination and senate committee hearings became a media trial before settling down on a bitterly divided vote. Its after-effects will never go away, at least not in the foreseeable future and every decision (or observation) by Mr Kavanaugh will be judged according to what went on and how his personality emerged from this saga.

The bellicose Trump era has an authoritarian look — perhaps a rare type of dictatorship.

Anas A. Khan

Edmonton AB, Canada

Published in Dawn, October 20th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.