ISLAMABAD: The counsel for a sitting high court judge facing a reference requested the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) on Monday to give his client a proper opportunity of defence.

“Instead of a summary trial, a proper charge sheet should be issued by SJC so that evidence could be furnished in support of the accused,” argued senior advocate Hamid Khan, representing Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui of the Islamabad High Court.

A source privy to a meeting of the SJC headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar said the preliminary hearing continued for over three hours.

The IHC judge is facing a third reference for a speech in which he targeted a particular constitutional institution.

On July 31, the SJC issued a show-cause notice to Justice Siddiqui on the reference for making unnecessary and unwarranted comments on July 21 at the Rawalpindi District Bar Association about some important constitutional institutions by accusing the establishment of manipulating the judicial proceedings.

The SJC took up the matter after considering that such comments prima facie had the tendency of undermining the respect otherwise due to such constitutional institutions.

The council did not consider another request of Justice Siddiqui to hold the proceedings of this reference in the open court.

Justice Siddiqui is alrea­dy facing a reference on misconduct earlier moved on the complaint by some retired employees of the Capital Development Authori­ty (CDA) for alleged refurbishment of his official residence beyond entitlement.

Against that reference, the judge filed in the Supreme Court a petition seeking open trial of the reference which is pending before the SJC and being heard in the open court.

Likewise, a similar show-cause notice was issued to Justice Siddiqui under Article 209 (5)(6) of the Constitution by the SJC on a reference moved by Advocate Kulsum Khaliq on behalf of former member of the National Asse­mbly Jamsh­ed Ahmed Dasti alleging that the high court judge had, during one of the hearings on a case relating to the 20-day Faizabad sit-in, objected to a compromise between the federal government and the protesting Tehreek-i-Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah. The compromise was facilitated by the armed forces.

After scrutinising the reference, a meeting of the SJC held on Feb 6 observed that the judge was guilty of misconduct and should be issued a show-cause notice in this regard.

Published in Dawn, October 2nd, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

‘Source of terror’
29 Mar, 2024

‘Source of terror’

ALTHOUGH dealing with the presence of terrorist groups in Afghanistan is a major political, security and strategic...
Chipping in
29 Mar, 2024

Chipping in

FEDERAL infrastructure development schemes are located in the provinces. Most such projects — for instance,...
Toxic emitters
29 Mar, 2024

Toxic emitters

IT is concerning to note that dozens of industries have been violating environmental laws in and around Islamabad....
Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...