ISLAMABAD: Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz leader Tallal Chaudhry on Thursday asked the Supreme Court to set aside its July 2 conviction awarded to him for committing contempt of court.

A three-page appeal filed through Mr Chaudhry’s counsel Kamran Murtaza argued that the verdict was “bad on facts and law” and, therefore, liable to be set aside since it was not sustainable in the eyes of the law.

On July 2, a three-judge bench comprising Justice Gulzar Ahmed, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood and Justice Faisal Arab had awarded Rs100,000 fine to Mr Chaudhry after he lost elections from constituency NA-102 Faisalabad. Earlier on June 28, the PML-N leader’s former cabinet colleague Danial Aziz was also convicted by the apex court on contempt charges and awarded the same punishment till rising of the court.

With the conviction, Tallal Chaudhry was also disqualified for five years under Article 63(1)(g) of the Constitution. The provisions says: “A person shall be disqualified from being elected or chosen a member of the parliament if he has been convicted by a court of competent jurisdiction for propagating any opinion or acting in any manner prejudicial to the ideology of Pakistan, or the sovereignty, integrity or security of Pakistan, or the integrity or independence of the judiciary of Pakistan or which defames or brings into ridicule the judiciary or the armed forces of Pakistan.”

Now through his appeal, Mr Chaudhry has recalled that contempt proceeding against him was initiated on a suo motu notice on a note of the Supreme Court registrar about his two speeches. Subsequently, a show-cause notice was issued which was replied by him, but the reply was found not satisfactory.

Mr Chaudhry contended that though he had deposited the fine amount and even served the sentence, he had filed the appeal to remove the stigma of being convicted.

He pleaded that the court, after examining the contempt case record, should set aside the July 2 conviction and acquit him of all charges.

Published in Dawn, September 7th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.