In the interest of justice

Published October 20, 2017

AFTER nearly three years of state-sanctioned violence during which 465 condemned prisoners have been put to death, any move in the opposite direction is welcome news.

Possibly under pressure from Western countries and international human rights bodies — although one hopes also from a desire to serve the ends of justice — Pakistan has decided to review the scope of the death penalty and consider reducing the number of capital offences.

Having recently been elected member of the UN Human Rights Council, and with its Universal Periodic Review coming up, Pakistan could certainly do with one blot less on its dismal human rights record.

At present, there are 27 crimes in the country that are punishable by death: among these are offences such as railway sabotage, drug smuggling and arms trafficking.

There has never been a considered debate about the death penalty in Pakistan, only an emotional response framed in binary terms.

The very lifting of the moratorium on capital punishment following the APS Peshawar attack on December 2014 was a knee-jerk reaction to a gut-wrenching event.

For a state on the back foot, faced with a furious, grieving public, the quickest way to appear in control of a rapidly unravelling security situation was to execute some of the approximately 8,000 prisoners on death row as a form of ‘instant retribution’.

This became a pattern in Punjab — the province that carried out 83pc of all executions during this period — where hangings spiked in the immediate aftermath of terrorist attacks.

Moreover, although the lifting of the moratorium, at least after the initial months, affected both those convicted of terrorism-related offences and those on death row for other capital crimes, only 16pc of executed prisoners had been convicted in the anti-terrorism courts — further evidence that the hangings were little more than a populist measure.

It stands to reason then that the decline in terrorist attacks has been on account of effective military action, rather than capital punishment acting as a deterrent, a theory anyway long debunked by multiple studies.

No debate about the death penalty is complete without considering the appalling state of the criminal justice system in Pakistan.

Unlike the privileged few who have the means to engage expensive legal counsel, the vast majority of litigants are at the mercy of state-appointed counsel too overburdened to provide a proper defence to those whose lives are on the line.

Shocking miscarriages of justice have come to light recently: prisoners executed before their appeals process had even been completed; juveniles sent to the gallows, death warrants issued for the physically infirm and the mentally ill, etc.

There have also been several cases where prisoners on death row have been acquitted after spending years behind bars.

That, if nothing else, is the most compelling argument against the final, irrevocable act of taking a person’s life.

Published in Dawn, October 20th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.