RCB mini-board stops working

Published August 19, 2003

RAWALPINDI, Aug 18: The three-member mini-board of the Rawalpindi Cantonment has stopped working after refusal of the apex court to grant interim relief to the civic body against a decision of the Lahore High Court which restored the elected board.

Despite restoration of the 12-member full board, the cantonment authorities have not allowed the elected members to exercise powers and the status quo has been maintained.

“Since the case is sub judice, we have to maintain the status quo,” says the cantonment executive officer, Khawaja Iftikhar Mir. The requisition notice for the elected board meeting has also been disposed of by the RCB administration on the plea that the case is still lying before the Lahore High Court.

The contention, however, has been opposed by the elected members who say that it is incumbent on the RCB administration to convene a meeting of the full board after its restoration by the superior court.

It was on this basis that about a week ago the elected members had held a meeting in the private office of their vice-president Chaudhry Tanveer Ahmad Khan. But the cantonment officials say the meeting had no official importance.

On the other hand, RCB president Brig Hamid Khalil has vested all powers with himself after the suspension of the mini-board, which also had only nominal existence.

The vice- president of the varied board was only a figurehead while actual powers were in the hands of the brigadier, said an elected member.

The civic body has been totally rudderless these days. The authorities concerned have been scrambling in vain to avoid a full board meeting. After its dismissal by the Supreme Court, the case is now in the High Court to be heard at the principal seat in Lahore in the first week of September.

The administrative affairs of the cantonment are being run by the RCB president, Brig Hamid Khalil, according to article 25 of the Cantonment Act 1924. The elected members are of the view that the attitude of the cantonment authorities constituted contempt of court.

“Despite the High Court order, the RCB administration has not delegated powers to the full board,” said Haji Ijaz, adding that de jure powers were with them and the elected board would continue holding sessions on its own if not convened by the administration.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...