Nationalist sentiment

Published February 28, 2017

WHEN a trust deficit spans decades, it becomes extremely difficult to bridge. While the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has aroused misgivings in Gilgit-Baltistan as well as all the provinces with smaller populations than Punjab that they will be shortchanged at the expense of the latter, Balochistan’s apprehensions are the deepest. Their fears have become a lightning rod for nationalists in the opposition as well as separatist groups. Akhtar Mengal, president of the Balochistan National Party-Mengal, reiterated the sentiment at a well-attended rally in Kharan on Sunday, saying that he saw no benefit accruing to the province from the implementation of CPEC projects. The much-vaunted “game changer for the region”, he alleged, would only benefit Punjab where related development projects have already been launched while the Baloch had for 70 years been deprived of even basic facilities.

While detractors would likely dismiss this view by saying that nationalists would by default adopt such a stance in order to stay relevant, that would betray a gross misreading of the situation and the sentiments of the Baloch — something that can be found in abundance in this country. Of the 2,600km that constitute CPEC’s western alignment, 1,300km runs through Balochistan, not to mention the fact that the deepwater port of Gwadar which lies on its shores is the centrepiece of the project. Yet the province is a bystander in the planning and rollout of CPEC within its boundaries. Certainly, Sindh and KP, and GB in particular, have complained of the same to some extent from time to time. However, in Balochistan, the sidelining of the people’s ‘voice’ takes on another dimension altogether. For many Baloch, it is the perpetuation of their grievances against the centre and their resentment that real control over their resources has long been exerted by the establishment rather than the province itself — even after the NFC award. The problem thus is a political one, not a socioeconomic one alone that will be resolved by giving some CPEC-related job opportunities to the people. The government must engage with nationalist organisations like BNP-M, even if it does not agree with their views, and consider their input with regard to CPEC if this mega infrastructure project is indeed to be a harbinger of prosperity. It would also be sound long-term strategy: after all, despite the attendant risks from separatist elements, the party has chosen to remain within the electoral mainstream. For that, and for many more reasons, it should be heard.

Published in Dawn, February 28th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

‘Source of terror’
Updated 29 Mar, 2024

‘Source of terror’

It is clear that going after militant groups inside Afghanistan unilaterally presents its own set of difficulties.
Chipping in
29 Mar, 2024

Chipping in

FEDERAL infrastructure development schemes are located in the provinces. Most such projects — for instance,...
Toxic emitters
29 Mar, 2024

Toxic emitters

IT is concerning to note that dozens of industries have been violating environmental laws in and around Islamabad....
Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...