WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said on Friday that he would go to court against an appeals court’s refusal to unfreeze a judicial stay on the execution of his travel ban.

And a White House official refused to rule out the possibility of President Trump issuing another executive order to implement his Jan 27 travel ban. The original order, which stops visitors from seven Muslim countries for 90 days and halts all immigrations for 120 days, was stayed last week by a court in Seattle, Washington.

And on Thursday, an appeals court in San Francisco upheld that freeze. In a unanimous opinion, a three-judge panel on the US Court of Appeals found that the administration had failed to show why the travel ban should be restored immediately.

“It’s a political decision. We will see them in the court and I look forward to do it,” President Trump told reporters at the White House. “We have a situation where the security of our country is at stake and it’s a very, very serious situation. So, we look forward, as I just said, to seeing them in court.”

And when CNN asked a White House official if Mr. Trump was considering signing a new executive order in the wake of the court’s decision, he said: “Nothing’s off the table.”

President Trump, however, was confident that the Supreme Court will rule in his favour. “It’s a decision that we will win, in my opinion, very easily. And by the way, we won that decision in Boston,” said the president while referring to an earlier verdict that went in his favour but the freeze by the Seattle court prevented the government from implementing the order.

In his tweet on Friday, President Trump criticised the appeals court for not undoing the stay order. “Remarkably, in the entire opinion, the panel did not bother even to cite this (the) statute. A disgraceful decision,” he said.

Mr Trump was referring to a statue that was highlighted by a legal site, Lawfare, which says that “whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or non-immigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate.”

In a unanimous 29-page opinion, three judges from the US Court of Appeals rejected the administration’s argument that the stay order should be lifted immediately for national security reasons.

The judges also said that the judiciary had the authority to serve as a check on the president’s power. The government’s argument that a court could not second-guess the president’s executive order “runs contrary to the fundamental structure of our constitutional democracy,” the judges said.

“It is beyond question that the federal judiciary retains the authority to adjudicate constitutional challenges to executive action,” they wrote.

Published in Dawn, February 11th, 2017

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.