Chronicling global peace

Published January 1, 2002

LOS ANGELES: A decade ago it seemed a neat idea to chronicle, at the Yuletide season, the progress of peace on earth. In 1991, it was a mixed bag. Iraq beaten back in the Gulf War, defeated, but not vanquished. A grizzly massacre in Yugoslavia. But, then, a hopeful-looking Arab-Israeli peace conference. A cooling off in Central America. Communal warfare ended in Africa. And a big enchilada, the 50-year cold war ended, and with it the fear of nuclear Armageddon.

At Christmastime in 1991, it was mentioned briefly Afghanistan, saying the Soviet-American proxy war was over; the fighting among rival Afghan factions, not yet. I said about Afghanistan, “Peace is a maybe, no better than that.” In succeeding years Afghanistan did not make it into the annual peace-war balance sheet. Not until a year ago, when it was mentioned, “in Afghanistan, a last-ditch fight against the ruling Taliban, with no reliable casualty figures.”

So now this year, what is there to say about peace on earth after Sept 11 that is not profoundly depressing? One can look for consolation in the relative peace in the Balkans, in divided Korea, in divided China, but one has to scrounge for the good news.

This year war has become no longer simply a matter of cross- border hostilities or internal feuds. The melancholy fact is the war has taken on an entirely new dimension, transcending borders. War today is a young Palestinian with a bomb strapped to his body. On a much vaster scale, it is the meticulously trained hijacker turning our technology against us as his ticket to glory. How do you cope with war by suicide?

There are organizations that annually tally the number of armed conflicts as a way of judging how peaceful the year has been. A year ago the National Defence Council Foundation in Alexandria, Virginia, counted 68 cross-border and internal conflicts around the world, an increase of three over the previous year. In the age of the war against terrorism, counting conflicts no longer works. There is one great transcendent conflict, a 21st-century version of struggling with the barbarians at the gates.

When St Luke spoke of peace on earth, it was not a prediction, but a prayer. With it went another prayer - “goodwill toward men.” It was to say you can’t have one without the other. This year, sad to say, in much of the world we had neither. —Dawn/LATS Service (c) Christian Science Monitor.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...