Rich nations fail aid pledge to poor

Published November 9, 2003

UNITED NATIONS: When more than 50 world political leaders and finance ministers from rich nations gathered in Mexico in March last year, they solemnly pledged to substantially increase their official development assistance (ODA) to the world’s poorer nations.

But 19 months later, the promises of increased aid held out at the International Conference on Financing for Development (FfD) in Monterrey, Mexico, have failed to materialize.

“There is a clear indication that counter-terrorism measures have subsumed the spirit of Monterrey and dashed hopes for international cooperation on financing for development,” Saradha Iyer of the Malaysia-based Third World Network, told IPS.

“And the prospects for the equitable and sustainable development of the South are bleak,” she added.

Last year, a glimmer of hope appeared when ODA from rich nations to the poor rose to 57 billion dollars, up from 52 billion dollars in 2001.

But the news of a five-billion-dollar increase brought little rejoicing to delegates, senior UN officials and representatives of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) at a high-level ministerial meeting on FfD in New York last week.

“This increase was totally overshadowed by two other haunting statistics,” Iyer said — the 800 billion dollars spent on military budgets worldwide in 2002, and the 200-billion-dollar net transfer of financial resources from the South to the North.

According to a study by the UN Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD, the flow of net resources was the largest ever from the world’s poorer nations to the rich.

According to Iyer, the money, which could have been used to promote investment in health, education and infrastructure in the developing world, has instead “perversely been channelled to the North, either because of debt servicing arrangements, asymmetries and imbalances in the trade system or because of inappropriate liberalization and privatization measures imposed upon them by the international financial and trading system”.

“The implications of these global trends are grave,” she warned, pointing out that the FfD meeting in New York “raised the spectre of gloom and doom for the realization of the UN’s Millennium Development Goals (MDGs)”.

The goals, endorsed by a special session of the UN General Assembly in September 2000, call for the world’s nations to slash global poverty and hunger in half by 2015. They also call for a global partnership for development.

“The fact that the poor subsidise the rich, to the tune of nearly 200 billion dollars per year, tells us just how seriously the G-8 (the world’s industrial nations and Russia) is taking its commitments to the poor,” says Raj Patel of the US-based Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy.

“Instead of redistributing wealth — wealth often appropriated from poor countries through colonialism — the international financial system legitimizes and encourages the expropriation of the poor,” Patel told IPS.

Worse yet, he said, is that it has been going on for years.

“The hypocrisy of the rhetoric of ‘financing for development’ cannot, ultimately, stand up to the facts.” One can only hope, he said, that with the publication of the UNCTAD study, citizens of conscience in rich countries will turn to their governments to demand justice for the peoples of the Third World.

But Mark Malloch Brown, chair of the UN Development Group and head of the UN Development Programme (UNDP), remains sceptical despite new commitments made by rich nations for an additional 16 billion dollars by 2006.

This includes new aid arrangements, including some five billion dollars proposed by the United States as part of its Millennium Challenge Account.

Malloch Brown estimates that if the MDGs are taken into account, the shortfall in ODA would be as high as 100 billion dollars a year — “even assuming developing countries raise domestic resources, pursue good macroeconomic policies and tackle corruption.”

“Today, the world is more unequal, and more insecure, than ever: we live in a world of six billion people, one billion of whom own 80 per cent of global wealth, while another billion struggle to survive on less than a dollar a day,” he said.

UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan was equally pessimistic about the deteriorating state of the Third World economy — rising external debts, declining foreign direct investments and distortions in international trade characterized by subsidies and tariff barriers protecting farmers and exporters in rich nations.—Dawn/The InterPress News Service.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...