Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

ISLAMABAD: While the Chief Justice of Pakistan’s (CJP) unprecedented address to the upper house of parliament was widely welcomed by the legal fraternity, some quarters have expressed concerns over what this precedent could mean for the relationship between the legislature and the judiciary.

On the invitation of Senate Chairman Raza Rabbani, CJP Anwar Zaheer Jamali spoke to the Senate as part of ‘an intra-institutional dialogue’ on Nov 4, where he reminded legislators that the real test lies in the implementation of laws.

“While the performance of the parliament leaves much to be desired, there are also several question marks on the judicial system as well,” said retired Justice Tariq Mehmood. The former president of the Supreme Court Bar Association wondered how the judiciary would react if parliament were to point finger at its shortcomings.

Also read: Chief justice reminds Senators of constitutional duties in first ever speech

In 2009, Mr Mehmood recalled, the Supreme Court had taken the position that the summoning of its registrar by the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) to settle certain audit objections was against the independence of the judiciary. A bench of the court had even issued a stay, restraining the registrar from attending the PAC meeting.

“Had this been a seminar or a conference where people from all walks of life are invited to share their experience on various topics, it would have been a different matter. But to address a house of parliament, which is in fact a political forum, is completely unusual and incomprehensible.”

The Chief Justice of Pakistan, he said, had gone to the Senate knowing that the legislation or constitutional amendments adopted by parliament eventually landed before the superior judiciary for interpretation. It would be better if the judiciary maintained a distance from the affairs of parliament, which is only accountable to the people of Pakistan, civil society and the media, he concluded.

But Mr Mehmood’s views are not shared by most other members of the legal fraternity, who consider the gesture a positive development that will go a long way in fostering badly-needed harmony between institutions.

“There has been a lot of discussion in bar rooms because the Chief Justice of Pakistan’s address was something novel, but we eventually reached the conclusion that dialogue between democratic institutions is far healthier than backdoor negotiations that have taken place in the past,” commented rights activist Asma Jahangir.

As long as such initiatives remain transparent and without agenda, there is no harm in having such exchanges between the judiciary and legislators, she said.

Ahmer Bilal Soofi, a leading expert on international law, argued that the address would set a good tradition and that it was helpful to understand the points of view of various constitutional institutions.

“This interaction, which was an extremely dignified gesture, will help foster some level of harmony without compromising the principled relationship between the judiciary and the parliament that used to be at the loggerheads in the not-too-distant past,” he said.

Newly-elected SCBA President Ali Zafar told Dawn such interactions would help dispel the impression that the judiciary was eroding the autonomy of parliament by repeatedly interfering in their domain.

“It is a very healthy sign that the chief justice had also hinted that the court will exercise self-restraint in taking suo motu notices on actions taken by institutions,” he said.

Former Additional Attorney General Tariq Khokhar recalled that the US Senate confirmed the appointment of the judges, whereas the chief justice in the United Kingdom used to address and even cast vote on legislative business conducted by the House of Lords. This practice, however, has been abandoned now, he said.

Published in Dawn, November 9th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Most Popular

Comments (4) Closed

In the line of roses Nov 09, 2015 08:00am

CJP spoked well to the Senate, he advise to implement laws and obey constitution.Our Pakistan is facing some economic difficulties,balance of payment problem,inflation,and numerous corruption cases in courts,and under investigation by agencies,power& water. Shortages,law & order,and security issues,CJP may please visit max possible institutions and encourage that you work independently without fear or pressure and keep Pakistan interest in mind,and take action against wrong doers as per law swiftly.

Mian Shahid Mehmood Nov 09, 2015 08:15am

The interaction on institutional level is commendable act on part of the CJP;

Aamir Nov 09, 2015 09:03am

The more the relationship between these institutions will warm up will result in more suffering for the general public. Time will prove this eventually

khanm Nov 09, 2015 01:26pm

The bottom line is....The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, alterable when the legislature shall please to alter it. It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is. This is the very essence of judicial duty.Secondly...All the rights secured to the citizens under the Constitution are worth