Imran Khan suspends Justice (r) Wajihuddin's PTI membership

Published August 5, 2015
“It is the Chairman who is authorised to make the final decision on what is in the best interest and advancement of the Party,”according to a statement issued by Shireen Mazari, who is the spokesperson for the PTI chief. — AFP/File
“It is the Chairman who is authorised to make the final decision on what is in the best interest and advancement of the Party,”according to a statement issued by Shireen Mazari, who is the spokesperson for the PTI chief. — AFP/File

KARACHI: Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) Chairman Imran Khan on Wednesday suspended the basic party membership of retired Justice Wajihuddin Ahmad, according to a statement issued by Shireen Mazari, who is the spokesperson for the PTI chief.

The statement said that the suspension came on the heels of Mr Khan’s Aug 4 notification stating that anyone discussing party matters publicly would be suspended from party membership.

Read: Imran Khan threatens to sack party members who spill beans to media

The statement said that Mr Ahmad had defied Mr Khan’s notification and declared that he would continue to air internal party matters in public.

It also elaborated that Mr Khan had held a three-hour long meeting with Justice (r) Wajihuddin last weekend, making it clear that “no democratic political party allows its members to discuss internal party matters in the public domain” and that grievances should be aired internally in party forums.

Also read: PTI chief resolves differences with Justice (r) Wajihuddin, Hamid Khan

The two-member tribunal headed by Mr Ahmad had been formed by the party in 2013 to investigate allegations of irregularities in the intra-party elections. After its detailed judgement, issued on March 18, Mr Khan had dissolved the tribunal, and issued a notification of its dissolution, which stated that the tribunal stood dissolved with effect from March 22.

The tribunal had earlier passed several orders on various petitions and termed the intra-party polls seriously flawed, reducing the terms of office of those elected from four years to two years.

Subsequently, after it had been officially dissolved, the tribunal summoned Mr Khan to appear before it on April 21 to explain why he had not complied with its earlier orders.

The retired justice had expressed his reservations, especially with regards to the non-implementation of his tribunal's decisions during a previous meeting.

PTI’s official statement said that in light of the Aug 4 notification, Mr Khan had been left with no choice but to suspend Mr Ahmad’s membership.

It emphasised that there should be no confusion about the fact that according to the party constitution “it is the Chairman who is authorised to make the final decision on what is in the best interest and advancement of the Party.”

Opinion

Editorial

Another U-turn?
Updated 07 Oct, 2022

Another U-turn?

The PTI’s decision to take back its resignations could herald a twist in the tussle playing out in Islamabad.
Renewed TTP threat
07 Oct, 2022

Renewed TTP threat

THE interior ministry’s call for ‘extreme vigilance’ and instructions to security forces to conduct ‘search...
Women’s gala in GB
07 Oct, 2022

Women’s gala in GB

REGRESSIVE forces, once again, nearly had their way — this time in Gilgit-Baltistan. A three-day sporting gala for...
‘Draconian’ law
06 Oct, 2022

‘Draconian’ law

THE debate over what it means to be ‘sadiq’ and ‘ameen’ has reignited after the incumbent Supreme Court ...
Welcome clarity
Updated 06 Oct, 2022

Welcome clarity

There needs to be consensus amongst all political actors that matters of governance should be the exclusive domain of civilians.
Car purchases
06 Oct, 2022

Car purchases

IF we are in the market to buy a new car, we end up paying a significantly large amount as premium over the sticker...