KARACHI, Oct 6: The Supreme Court dismissed here on Monday an appeal by two police officials of the anti-car lifting cell against registration of a car snatching case against them.

Sub-inspector Abdul Qadir Rind and ASI Saalim Rind were ordered to be booked by the Sindh High Court on Aug 11. Justice Amir Hani Muslim of the SHC Hyderabad bench also directed the IGP Sindh to initiate departmental proceedings against them. He also ordered that the two officials would not be given field posting and that a violation of this order would amount to contempt of court.

The order against the officials was passed on a writ petition moved by Mohammad Anees, a transporter of Hyderabad. He said he was intercepted by a police squad led by the two officials and Ehtesham alias Chief, employee of an insurance company, on his return from the Liaquat Medical College Hospital, Jamshoro, where he had gone to pick up his friend, Dr Asad, at 12 noon on July 11, 2002. He and Dr Asad were made to get down from the car and were “imperiously” and peremptorily told by the officials that they were travelling in a stolen car.

Without giving Anees an opportunity to explain his position or show the car’s registration and other documents, the officials fled away in the car to an unknown destination. Before driving away in his car, the officials demanded Rs 100,000 as illegal gratification. They also took away Rs 16,000 from his pocket.

The SHC order on the writ petition was challenged by the two officials in the Supreme Court. The appeal came up before a bench, comprising Chief Justice Shaikh Riaz Ahmad and Justice Deedar Husain Shah, at the SC’s Karachi registry. The bench upheld the SHC order, which was defended by Additional Advocate-General Qazi Khalid Ali, and dismissed the appeal.

POLL PLEA DISMISSED: The bench also disallowed an appeal against a three-member SHC bench judgment dismissing a writ petition seeking disqualification of MPA Ali Bakhsh Shah (Puppoo Shah) of Badin for being a non-graduate. The writ petition was dismissed before the election notification and petitioner Haji Abdul Karim assailed the SHC decision before the Supreme Court. Meanwhile, he moved an election petition, which is pending before a tribunal, comprising Justice Ghulam Rabbani.

The appeal was argued at length by Advocate Khalid Anwer for the appellant and Barrister Abdul Hafeez Pirzada for the respondent MPA on Monday. Deputy Attorney-General Syed Zaki Mohammad assisted the court.

Upholding the submissions made by the DAG and Mr Pirzada, the bench observed that under Article 225 of the Constitution, a legislator’s election could be called into question only by an election petition presented to an election tribunal under the Representation of People Act.

All matters agitated in the appeal could be raised before the tribunal, it observed.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...