Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

KABUL: Afghanistan's parliament failed to pass a law on Saturday banning violence against women, a severe blow to progress made in women's rights in the conservative Muslim country since the Islamist Taliban was toppled over a decade ago.

President Hamid Karzai approved the law by decree in 2009 and parliament's endorsement was required. But a rift between conservative and more secular members of the assembly resulted in debate being deferred to a later date.

Religious members objected to at least eight articles in the legislation, including keeping the legal age for women to marry at 16, the existence of shelters for domestic abuse victims and the halving of the number of wives permitted to two.

“Today, the parliamentarians who oppose women's development, women's rights and the success of women...made their voices loud and clear,” Fawzia Koofi, head of parliament's women's commission, told Reuters.

Women have won back the hard-fought right to education and work since the Taliban was toppled 12 years ago, but there are fears these freedoms could shrink once NATO-led forces leave Afghanistan by the end of next year.

Increasing insecurity is deterring some women from seeking work outside the home, and rights workers accuse the government of doing too little to protect women - allegations rejected by Karzai's administration.

“2014 is coming, change is coming, and the future of women in this country is uncertain. A new president will come and if he doesn't take women's rights seriously he can change the decree,” Koofi said of the Elimination of Violence Against Women Law, which goes by the acronym EVAL.

The election for a new president is expected to be held in April 2014. The constitution bars Karzai from running again.

After almost two hours of clashes between Koofi and the more religious members of the 244-member parliament, speaker Abdul Rauf Ibrahimi said the assembly would consider the law again at a later date, but declined to say when.

Some members sought amendments, such as longer prison terms for crimes committed against women, such as beating and rape.

Many lawmakers, most of them male, cited violations of Islamic, or Sharia law.

“It is wrong that a woman and man cannot marry off their child until she is 16,” said Obaidullah Barekzai, a member from southeast Uruzgan province, where female literacy rates are among the lowest in the country.

An Afghan man must be at least 18 years old to marry.

Barekzai argued against all age limits for women, citing historical figure Hazrat Abu Bakr Siddiq, a close companion of the Prophet Mohammad, who married off his daughter at age seven.

At least eight other lawmakers, mostly from the Ulema Council, a government-appointed body of clerics, joined him in decrying the EVAL as un-Islamic.

Abdul Sattar Khawasi, member for Kapisa province, called women's shelters “morally corrupt”.

Justice Minister Habibullah Ghaleb last year dismissed them as houses of “prostitution and immorality”, provoking fierce condemnation from women's groups.

Comments (4) Closed

Riaz Ahmad May 19, 2013 09:47am

So you can't blame it on the Taliban alone, there are enough parliamentarians in the Afghan government that do not see women as equals. Sadly, in the day and age of 21st century, almost all Islamic countries are united in discrimination against female sect. Those who do not change with time will always lag behind.

Omer Maqsood May 19, 2013 01:51pm

Wow so these are the enlightened people who have been brought forward by the US after 14y war and approximately 14 trillion dollars of investment. My my its really working lol! Keep up

Nottelling May 20, 2013 04:19am

Tarnishing the rights of another through their own religion and way is unfair though.

Wakhan May 20, 2013 10:47am

@Omer Maqsood :

Why are you acting so stupid? The law proposed had contradictions with the Sharia. Secondly those handful women do not represent the women of Afghanistan. Not only male MPs opposed the law but there were many women MPs opposing the law.

Afghanistan is an islamic state and Afghans would never let it happen be that America or anyone else.