Dangerous direction

Published September 22, 2012

ALREADY nervous about what the day would bring, citizens found yesterday that the state, too, had done its bit to disrupt life as far as possible. Cellular networks were suspended; those who do not have access to landlines — and there are many such people — found that they were cut off from family, friends and colleagues. This on a day when the streets in many areas were filled with smoke and television screens with frightening images of enraged mobs attacking indiscriminate targets. Many would have been concerned for the safety of loved ones but they had been rendered incommunicado.

This is not the first time the government has resorted to taking such an enormously disruptive step. On the eve of Eid, cellphone users found services inexplicably suspended. The government had cited a potential terrorist threat as the reason — militants too use the technology to their own advantage. Nevertheless, that does not mean that the rulers can arrogate to themselves the right to arbitrarily and without warning cut off access to indispensable devices. Given the sort of violence that occurred in Peshawar, Islamabad, Karachi and elsewhere yesterday, it seems that the move proved futile as it failed to prevent protesters from communicating. And it would be useful for the government to remember that in earlier decades, when there was no cellular technology, the country had seen much larger and more violent demonstrations. The good such a step may achieve is eclipsed by the very serious inconvenience it causes several million people. Beyond inconvenience, there is the aspect of the huge monetary losses that were incurred by various businesses, not the least of which are cellphone companies themselves. Such a decision should be a last resort, or else it will set a dangerous precedent. Will citizens start losing cellular services whenever a large protest is in the offing? If it goes down this road again, the government will find itself treading an increasingly fraught path; the line between when it is and is not reasonable to take such a stringent step will be blurred to the point of being erased.

Opinion

Editorial

Doctor attacked
09 Jun, 2026

Doctor attacked

AN act of reprehensible violence has shaken the medical community. On Saturday, an employee of the Provincial Civil...
AJK flare-up
Updated 09 Jun, 2026

AJK flare-up

The situation started deteriorating after a trader affiliated with the JAAC was reportedly shot in an altercation with law-enforcers.
Fault lines
09 Jun, 2026

Fault lines

THE April 8 ceasefire that halted hostilities between Israel and Iran has encountered its most serious test yet....
Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...