Doctors who shouldn’t be
I AM seriously disappointed by the writer’s thoughts in the article Doctors who shouldn’t be (issue of July 14, 2002). The writer is a male chauvinist!
Sunday Magazine is one of the most informative and useful sections of Dawn. I never expected it to print articles which disappoint its readers. The said article promotes the idea that females should not become doctors. Even if some women doctors do not practise medicine, it’s enough that they are educated in a Third-World country such as Pakistan where education should be the first priority. Such articles do nothing except to dishearten readers.
The writer actually blames women for not practising medicine, even though he is clearly aware of their problems. He also gives parallel examples of men who have given up practice. Then there is his want of reverting back to the old quota system which allows 30 per cent seats for girls. He should realize that more females would die every year in Pakistan than they do now because most women only go to lady doctors. The quota system also wouldn’t do much to screen out those who wouldn’t practice later on. The writer should have at least given a second thought before penning down his thoughts.
AMNA MUZAFFAR
Karachi
From Lahore to Indian cinema
THE article by Saeed Malik (issue of July 14, 2002) entitled From Lahore to Indian cinema was very interesting and informative. However, I want to point out that few persons were mistakenly quoted from Punjab.
Pirthvi Raj Kapoor had never worked at the then Calcutta. He and composer/producer Rafique Ghaznavi both belonged to Peshawar. Pirthvi was still studying at Edward’s College in Peshawar, while his father, Lala Bashisher Nath, was deputed to Bombay Police. The Kapoor family shifted thereafter.
The writer has quoted Nazim Panipati and Rajinder Krishen as Punjabi. Panipat in Punjab? Rajinder Krishen was also from the South. Saeed Malik has missed some elites,too, such as Bilraj Sahani and two present-day lyricists, Anand Bakhshi and Dev Kohli. These three belonged to Rawalpindi. He also missed a great actor, Rehman, and a very fine writer/lyricist, Raja Mohdi Ali Khan (nephew of the great leader, freedom fighter, poet, writer and journalist, Moulana Zafar Ali Khan).
ENVER EIJAZ KHAN
Peshawar
Love seeketh self to delight
I HAVE read the article by Fareeha Khan Sherwani entitled Love seeketh self to delight (issue of July 14, 2002), in which she compares Shakespeare to Shaw. I thoroughly disagree with her.
She has compared the two eras, and not the two dramatists. Shakespearean characters have been a source of psychological study. Sigmund Freud has done a psychoanalytical study on the Macbeths (Macbeth and Lady Macbeth).
Shaw’s Pygmalion does not present a very realistic view of the world as the writer claims. Professor Higgins decides to tutor a flower girl, thinking that he would make her suitable for the elite. Isn’t this dwelling into fancy? I guess the writer has not read the superb playwright of all times, William Shakespeare. His language is an industry in itself: he has used a range of 30,000 words in his plays, whereas we only use 10 to 15,000 words these days.
It would have been better for the writer to compare the two contemporaries such as Shakespeare or Marlowe, but the comparison between an Elizabethan dramatist and a Modern Irish dramatist makes no sense at all.
SHARMEEN AKBANI
Karachi
A closed mind
I TOTALLY agree with Manzoor Ahmed and the views he has expressed in his article A closed mind (issue of July 28, 2002) that the ills that plague our society such as decreasing tolerance, increasing aggression and violence, dulling of moral sensitivity, etc, are fast becoming the hallmark of our society. Where is all this going to lead us to as a nation? Somewhere dark, bleak and depressing, I’m sure.
Why can’t there be people who care about what we contribute towards society. Mind you, I do not say educated people here because education, as I have learned, does not necessarily guarantee refinement of the senses needed to uplift society. We, as a nation, need to take a close look at ourselves and do something about societal deterioration before it gets too late and we are left with nothing.
This great nation was created by a great man to fulfil a great destiny. It’s a crime to just stand by and watch its destruction by the very people for whom it was created in the first place.
FARAH SHAUKAT
Karachi
|