Puzzling bias: Party manifestos

Published Apr 19, 2013 01:06am

AN urban bias tends to run through all parties’ manifestos in Pakistan, although far less so with the PPP. This bias tends to see rural society as basically an agricultural platform, and views economic benefit primarily in terms that are unique to the urban economy. To be fair, the PPP’s manifesto makes plenty of reference to rural schemes and economic issues such as livestock cooperatives and boosting milk processing and crop insurance. But coming from an incumbent party, it is entirely reasonable to ask for the track record first and the manifesto second. It’s true that this government initiated a large-scale transfer of government and economic resources towards the rural economy, primarily through the administered pricing mechanism such as the wheat procurement price; but it is equally true that much of the benefit of the redirection has accrued to large landowners and wielders of influence in rural society rather than the small-scale farmer, who was supposed to be the beneficiary.

The manifestos of the other two big parties in the upcoming electoral race — the PML-N and the PTI — are more obviously urban in nature and talk mostly of the concerns of the formal urban economy. They are silent on crucial reforms required in the rural economy. The PML-N, for instance, speaks of deficits and investment and “industrial revival” in its manifesto, and despite the existence of a subheading on “agriculture,” even here the underlying emphasis carries an urban bias by talking about the productive aspects of rural society and not about the kinds of reforms required for its uplift. The PTI’s manifesto, drawn up by some of the best professional minds in the country, similarly talks of rural society only as a productive platform for the economy, but not as a social zone with its own problems and requirements. Considering that the rural vote can turn the tide in an election, it is puzzling that the manifestos of the largest parties carry such a deep urban bias.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

LNG import: some questions

Is the govt thinking of sharply increasing the number of vehicles running on CNG after this decision is implemented?

Perilous journeys

The desire to flee violence and persecution, as well as seeking greener pastures, often leads to desperate steps.

VIP culture

Taken as a principled stand, it must have felt good even if it wasn’t an earth-shattering victory.

Comments (3) (Closed)


Ijaz
Apr 19, 2013 05:58am
"but it is equally true that much of the benefit of the redirection has accrued to large landowners and wielders of influence in rural society rather than the small-scale farmer, who was supposed to be the beneficiary" Can I assume 'DAWN' considers 'society' and its structures can be changed by governments only? Dear media, why cant you try to teach 'small-scale' stake holders to 'team-up' which is tried and tested way to guarantee their interest protection. Governments are there only to create opportunities, not to dole out charities through reckless projects or coercion. Social development is all about playing one's cards skillfully, not desiring for messiahs or asking for charities - which are only for the incapacitated ones for a limited time only.
Agha Ata (USA)
Apr 19, 2013 02:49pm
IMRAN KHAN, I hope you have read this article.
Faryad
Apr 19, 2013 06:05pm
It is not puzzling at all, the rural society is neglected because of the voting patterns. Rural voters care less about the party and their manifestos than their own family and biradari ties, whereas urban voters, who are generally more educated, care about the policies of the government and vote independently.