IN what was termed a routine meeting of the Afghan National Security Council on Sunday President Hamid Karzai instructed his ministers of defence, interior and foreign affairs to take “immediate action” to see to the removal of the border gate, checkpost and other installations built by Pakistan along the Durand Line. He alleged these had been built without coordination.

These instructions followed a verbal protest that had been lodged by Afghanistan’s deputy foreign minister with our ambassador in Kabul on April 1.

In issuing these instructions, Karzai had clearly chosen to ignore the rejoinder to the April 1 protest by the Pakistan Foreign Office spokesman who said the post in question — Gursal in Mohmand Agency bordering Afghanistan’s Nangarhar province — was well within Pakistan territory. The spokesman said it had existed for many years and was only being renovated, and that an Afghan military delegation visiting Mohmand in January had been briefed on the nature of the renovation work.

While media reports seem to suggest that better sense has prevailed and that the Afghans have conceded that the Pakistan Army was indeed renovating the post and was not involved in the construction of a new one, the incident has been distasteful. With accusations coming from the office of the Afghan president himself, there could have been grim consequences. This only shows how fraught Pak-Afghan relations continue to be, with distrust and suspicions taking precedent over any sincere move to remove tensions. And there are several questions to ponder regarding this latest incident in the saga of bad blood.

Why, for instance, was this verbal attack launched in April when the Afghans had known of the renovation at least since January? Why was there no attempt to counter the statement of facts relating to the post provided by the Pakistani officials and presumably communicated to the Afghans formally by our ambassador in Kabul or the Afghan envoy in Islamabad?

It is difficult to find a logical explanation. Did this serve any purpose other than to further strain Pak-Afghan ties at a time when Pakistan has a caretaker government charged only with ensuring free and fair elections, not with undertaking new initiatives in foreign or domestic policy?

Whatever the purpose of Karzai’s outburst one hopes that our interim government will not respond harshly but confine itself to reiterating the facts and then hold further discussions at the next border coordination meeting or at the ministerial meeting of the Istanbul Process in Almaty on April 26. Hopefully before that time the prime minister would have assigned the foreign affairs portfolio to one of his cabinet colleagues since it is important for us to be represented at that level in Almaty.

But Karzai is not taking on Pakistan alone. Karzai recently issued a statement, based on the report of the team he had sent to Kunar to investigate the air attack by US planes on insurgent houses that resulted apparently in the death of 17 civilians including 12 children.

His statement condemned “the use of civilians and their homes as shields by the Taliban” but added that air strikes on residential areas are not acceptable “under any name and for any purpose whatsoever”. While the investigation team suggested that this was an incident triggered by an Afghan intelligence operation to capture two Taliban insurgents there are plausible reports that this was in fact a CIA operation mounted by irregular Afghan forces led by a CIA operative who was killed while retreating from the area.

Nato has completed its own report on the incident but has not released it since it was still under review.

For the moment though what is important is the disclosure in Karzai’s statement that, in a telephonic conversation with President Obama earlier in the week, he had said that such incidents could jeopardise the conclusion of the US-Afghan security pact that would govern the residual US military presence in Afghanistan after 2014.

Karzai thus appears to be at loggerheads with both his principal supporter and his most important neighbour. Hopefully, both benefactor and neighbour will avoid an intemperate public response. Today, Afghanistan has only one legitimate leader and therefore only one legitimate enunciator of Afghan policy. He, despite a belief to the contrary, is, at this time, the only person who can carry forward the currently stalled process of reconciliation.

We have to remember that Afghanistan’s descent into chaos will cause enormous damage to US prestige but will be devastating for Pakistan and its own struggle against terrorist elements within the country as is evident from the ongoing campaign in the Khyber Agency.

Other costs to Pakistan have never been computed accurately but I was struck by a recently released report of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime which concluded that in 2013 the area in Afghanistan devoted to opium cultivation would increase substantially — especially in Helmand province.

According to a UNODC official, Afghanistan is in danger of becoming “the world’s first true narco-state” because it is poised to once again become the producer of 90 per cent of the world’s opium. Long considered only a producer rather than a consumer of opium, it now has more than a million users. Warlords flourish on the proceeds of opium production and trafficking.

We are not better off. In 1979, we had 30,000 registered addicts and perhaps an equal number of unregistered users. As production increased in Afghanistan so did our user population. Today in Pakistan, according to the US annual report on Narcotics Control Strategy released in March this year, “there are an estimated 500,000 addicts and over five million habitual drug users”.

Pakistan was also the world’s foremost heroin transit country in 2012. UNODC estimates that 40pc of the world supply traversed the country en route to China, the Gulf States, Africa, and Europe.

We need peace in Afghanistan to have peace in Pakistan and, under the circumstances, must work with whoever is in power in Kabul.

The writer is a former foreign secretary.

More From This Section

A reign of fear

AN environment of deepening fear across the country is not only making it hard for the people, especially the more...

Auction mania

FINANCE Minister Ishaq Dar is soaking up the applause these days, rolling out his narrative of economic improvement...

Two sides of one coin

Policing must be tempered with human rights.

New status for TTP?

Classifying TTP as ‘enemy combatants’ is problematic.


Comments are closed.

Comments (15)

ali raza
April 17, 2013 7:38 am
I am still unable to comprehend as to why Afghanistan looks with suspicion at every step taken by Pakistan in its own interest???Certainly a million dollar question...
Salman
April 17, 2013 8:16 am
his Highness, Hamid Karzai is getting desperate with every passing day when US withdrawal is nearing. He knows that he doesn't have any place in post US-Afghanistan, and now he is venting out his grudges against Pakistan. Moreover; this move is not without a "consent"
gul khan
April 17, 2013 10:59 am
no country trust Pakistan
Samra
April 17, 2013 11:46 am
Gul Khan Baba tum tou chap karo Naswar Khaw or Sou jayo
imtiaz Hydari
April 17, 2013 1:23 pm
Karzai is a stooge, a nobody. How long will he last when the Americans have gone? he does not speak for the majority Afghans. Ignore his crude unbalanced remarks. Only Mr Zardari gives him importance - birds of a feather ........
awakening
April 17, 2013 1:32 pm
thats why we kept million of afghans for 20 years in our country, what we got in return drugs, prostitution and weapons, all afghans have given to this world is opimium and problems we need to make pieces of afghanistan, seconldy its high time Pakistan should assert its self on other side...
Muhammad Ahmed Mufti
April 17, 2013 1:39 pm
Afghanistan has always been source of instability for the sub-continent. The distrust goes way back. Shah Latif has well mentioned that "Sindh your troubles will always come from Kandahar". It is time for Pakistan to assert its border with Afghanistan. The boarder must be heavily mined and travel with valid papers should be enforced. For divided families and people living on or across the border, biometric data can be captured and used for travel control.
palwasha
April 17, 2013 3:39 pm
we don't need your trust. Stay away and STAY OUT of our country's affairs!
NASAH (USA)
April 17, 2013 3:45 pm
History.
Dr.M.M.Khan
April 17, 2013 4:04 pm
Does any body trust :Shah Shuja: in Afghanistan. Hamid Karazai like Shah Shuja was imposed on Afgahnistan. Now he knows his time is up and he has decided not og down withought a wimper. He will create crisis out of anything.
sri1ram
April 17, 2013 5:03 pm
Hehhhh, unfortunately "own interest" is detrimental to the interests and well-being of not only yourselves, but all neighbors and even other continents. Everyone except the citizens of the pure nation is aware of this fact, but of course you and your ilk will always deny and blame endless conspiracy theories and support strategic depth policies. So be it, your unfortunate people are reaping the fruits of what your establishment has sown.
Ruby
April 17, 2013 6:49 pm
No wonder when Pakistani leaders and bureaucrats treat Afghanistan like this, the hostility is bound to remain. This is just one more article trying to undermine the Afghan government, the excuse being that the government is headed by Karzai. While Pakistanis had demanded,with Zardari as their President, a seat at the negotiating table. What hypocrisy?! And a lot of articles like this present a strawman argument against the Afghan administration. The recent hostilities flared up after Afghans were killed in Pakistani shelling. Only the masters of deception are capable of potraying the Afghan government as the real problem while the hosted the high councils of terrorists all along in their territory.
majid canada
April 17, 2013 10:18 pm
and how many countries trust afghanistan?
ali raza
April 18, 2013 2:34 am
Pakistan is the atomic fort of Islam so it is disliked by western countries.Afghanistan is influenced by anti-Pakistan agenda so it is easy to blame and say we do not trust you.
gul khan
April 18, 2013 9:04 am
very cheap shot
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page