RAWALPINDI, April 9: The City District Government Rawalpindi (CDGR) on Tuesday introduced a new fee to be taken from all political parties who want to project their candidates for election 2013.

The new district administration will charge national and provincial assembly candidates for their banners, posters, handbills and other projection material.

However, political parties such as Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf (PTI), Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) and others, rejected the move and termed it a ‘tax’ on electioneering.

They said they would not pay the forced tax for their party flags and posters.

The CDGR issued directives to assistant commissioners in the district to collect the fee from political parties for hoardings, banners, posters, party flags and distribution of pamphlets and handbills.

It fixed a fee of Rs120 per month for two-feet by three-feet posters, 3X5 hoardings at Rs450 per month, 3X9 feet banner at Rs225 per week and handbills 9X6 inch at Rs7.56 per day.

PPP City President Aamir Fida Paracha told Dawn that the move was non-practical.

“It is a violation of the democratic norms that political parties would have to get the permission from the bureaucracy to run their campaigns,” he said.

“The current District Coordination Officer has been transferred from Lahore to Rawalpindi, and is close to former Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif. He tried to make his own contractors happy by collecting the fee from political parties at the time of electioneering,” Paracha said.

PML-N’s former Member of National Assembly Malik Shakil Awan also lashed out at the administration and said the new administration in the garrison city had decided to impose tax on the electioneering process, forcing political workers to avoid campaigns for their candidates.

“The PML-N rejects the new system and the City District Government Rawalpindi has to reverse it. One thing is clear; the candidates or political parties will not pay tax for the hoardings, banners or distribution of handbills,” he said.

Jamaat-i-Islami (JI) Rawalpindi spokesman Malik Azam said the CDGR distributed millions of rupees among the PML-N legislators in its tenure and after facing shortage of funds, it was now introducing new ways to collect tax from the political parties.

He said the JI would accept those rules which were issued by the election commission.

The CDGR had no right to impose its rules for the electioneering in the district.

“We rejected the move and will not allow the CDGR to collect tax from the political parties by snatching their right to expression,” he said.

Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf (PTI) leader and former district nazim Raja Tariq Kiani said the move was unrealistic and against the tradition of the elections.

He said in the past the City District Government Rawalpindi allotted some sites for commercial ads along the main roads but for elections it allowed the political parties to install their banners, posters and party flags according to the rules of the Election Commission of Pakistan.

“We are going to elect the leadership of the country and these tactics create hurdles for the political parties. The move is not acceptable for the political workers as the election commission has already limited candidates from spending more than Rs1 million for provincial assembly and Rs1.5million for national assembly seats,” he explained.

He said the new administration should play the role of facilitators rather than create hurdles.

When contacted, Assistant Commissioner City Fahad Waqar Azeem told Dawn that the fee was introduced after consulting ECP’s code of conduct Section-10.

This allows local administration to charge fee for such hoardings, and political parties should take the permission from CDGR before setting up banners, he said.

“The candidate or political parties should contact City District Government Rawalpindi taxation office or assistant commissioner office to get the permission after paying the fee for their posters,” he added.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.