Dawn News

March, 30 2015
e-paper

Apex court should define corruption

IT is redeeming to read the Chief Justice’s remarks that corrupt elements would not be allowed to enter the parliament. Further observation by him that every contestant should be subjected to strict scrutiny is encouraging.

But corruption has many guises. Nevertheless, with all its manifestations, it is loathsome and condemnable. It is a disease from which no one is immune. It does not respond to ordinary cure treatments, but requires major surgery.

Owing to the collusion between the two parties, corruption is extremely hard to prove in the court of law. Moreover, it is not only confined to accepting cash. An individual may scrupulously be honest in financial matters but very weak morally or in work ethic.

Similarly, if a person is swayed by personal prejudices such as racial, ethnic, social, cultural, jealousy, in his/her work - related decisions, this would be tantamount to corruption.

Our history tells us that corruption charges are extremely difficult, if not impossible, to prove. This is one reason that parties, despite being corrupt, claim that they are innocent.

It would be better for the SC to shed some light on its claim. Being the final interpreter of the constitution, it should define the word corruption.

RAJA SHAFAATULLAH Islamabad


Email news tips and feedback to News Desk, submit blogs to Blog Desk and share photos and Videos with Special Projects Desk.


Comments (3) Closed



wachucha
Apr 05, 2013 03:48pm
A good point. I'm sure it will eventually happen in future but not now as the individuals responsible for providing the definition of corruption are not clean either.
aziz
Apr 05, 2013 04:58pm
I think the best person to define corruption is Mr. Zardari. He is the elected head of the state and therefore represents the voice of the nation.
Syed Ahmed
Apr 05, 2013 07:55pm
Being know as Mr. 10% world over an attribute of good reputation? I was in Honolulu Hawaii in early 2009, where a Somali Taxi Driver, by the name of Rasheed, asked me and my wife why Mr. Zardari who is recognized as Mr.10% installed as the President of Pakistan. I replied that he has been provided an opportunity to re-build his reputation. Has he built or re-built his reputation and weather Article 62 (1) d of the constitution is attracted?