Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

PROTECT the environment of national parks or draw in the investors and tourists whose spending helps make such projects viable and desirable? On the one hand, there is the tug of the conservation instinct and the need to save flora and fauna from harm. On the other, there is the certain knowledge that tourists require roads and restaurants, restrooms and parking areas, and that developing a national park as an attractive educational and recreational spot requires construction that is bound to have an impact on the pristine quality of the area. Finding a balance may not be easy, but it has to be sought.

How does Pakistan score in this regard? On the books, the network of protectionist legislation looks quite reasonable. The trouble is, not just is there inefficient implementation, the laws also allow for loopholes and discretionary actions that cause havoc in a country where concern about the environment is generally afforded low priority. A case in point is Islamabad’s Margalla Hills National Park, once largely an area of wilderness that supported a fair variety of animals. But, as the director-general of the Pakistan Environment Protection Agency pointed out at a moot on Sunday, the Islamabad Wildlife Ordinance 1979 is so worded that it actually makes the job of environmentalists more difficult, allowing for construction and including a clause that allows the regulations to be bypassed at discretion. Such provisos have meant that prime locations in the park have fallen prey to unbridled commercialism. This is all very well for the investors and such sections of the spending public that are well-heeled, but environmentalists point out that the damage being sustained by the park area will prove irredeemable in the future. The same situation is found in several other park and heritage areas across the country, sometimes with the state itself playing the role of destructor. What is the point of deeming an area protected if that is not how it will be treated?

DAWN_VIDEO - /1029551/DAWN-RM-1x1

Most Popular

LARGE_RECTANGLE_BOTTOM - /1029551/Dawn_ASA_Unit_670x280

Comments (2) Closed

Ahmed j Apr 02, 2013 09:59am
One has to understand the meaning of Parks. National Parks all over the world are considered as Natural Parks and fauna & flora are protected by law. The visitors enjoy and learn the natural environment. However, in Pakistan Natural Parks are confused with Theme Parks and amusement is linked to commercially operated machines and shows. Both these parks are poles apart in understanding. Ayub National Park at Rawalpindi, which once was developed as natural park faced environmental disaster and converted into a theme park. This was a planned birth of commercialisation and death of a National Park by the Cantonment Board.
Agha Ata (USA) Apr 02, 2013 02:42pm
Destroying parks around Islamabad has a purpose. It will stop the new government from showing sabz bagh to the nation.