This refers to the letter by Wing Commander (r) Ahmed Shah Jan (March 27). The writer, I believe, has been my worthy colleague at the PAF Academy, Risalpur.

An English teacher by profession, he writes well. But on this occasion I have not been able to understand what cavil he had at my letter on the subject (March 11), when he said “a foot soldier should be getting twice as much as an army officer because his chances of dying in a war are far greater than officers performing non-active and risk-free roles”.

The comparison appears odious. It is not only the extent of exposure to risk but the substantive value of the life lost.

As regards the numbers, foot soldiers are employed in far greater numbers in a war than army officers, hence their casualties are more.

So what is the catch? But the disparity in the pay and perks between an officer and a foot soldier in the context of the army and more particularly in the context of PAF between a pilot and a ground officer or airmen in the context of PAF is not only due to the risk factor but also due to the element of demand and supply.

Look at the rate of attrition of pilots. From the time they report for training to the time they become senior officers, a large number of them either perish or grounded or otherwise eliminated.

An operational pilot is, therefore, not only highly skilled but hard to come by, like gold dust. This explains the disparity between a ground branch officer and a pilot.

However, it is true that the disparity in other service matters is at times unnecessarily stretched too far to the chagrin of the ground branch officer. But this requires a separate discussion.

Group Capt (r) S.M. ANWAR Karachi

More From This Section

Foreign intelligence intervention

SPEAKING to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee about unrest in parts of eastern Ukraine, US Secretary of State...

FCR: Fata woes

THE tribal people are controlled under the black law known as the Frontier Crimes Regulation (FCR). The tribal ...

Draft labour policy

APROPOS the news report ‘Anomalies in labour policy draft pointed out’ (April 11), it is mentioned: “It...

Hazardous cooking oil

THIS is apropos the reports ‘Import of hazardous cooking oil’ (April 11) and ‘China, India face huge cancer...


Comments are closed.

Comments (3)

Maverick
March 30, 2013 6:41 am
Please explain to me why GD(P) pilots in UAV squadrons are still getting the flying allowance and please do not say that flying a UAV is a very difficult and a dangerous job. Also please explain when an officer from the GD(P) branch reaches the rank of Gp Capt his days of flying mostly end so explain to me when Gp Capt to ACM does not fly then why they still get the flying allowance.
Tahir
March 30, 2013 9:42 am
I am ashamed to read about this rivalry between our fighting forces for the sake of security of the country. This, rivalry, differences in status and looking down on others is like cancer which is preventing us from making progress in all walks of our lives. Can we just drop this subject and not bring ourselves so low as to have it published in a national newspaper.
Fahad
March 31, 2013 4:55 am
I hate to see such corruption in the armed forces. Petty bickering over allowances. I thought that was the domain of the civil servants. Apparently not. Let's end this once and for all and establish equality in pay between pilots and ground officers of the same rank.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page