US State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland. - Reuters File Photo
US State Department spokesperson Victoria Nuland. - Reuters File Photo

WASHINGTON: The United States does not want to return President Zardari to power or block Nawaz Sharif or Imran Khan from winning the forthcoming election, said a senior US official while talking to a group of Pakistani journalists at a recent diplomatic reception.

Other US officials are equally enthusiastic in denying the general perception in Pakistan that the US government wants to influence the electoral process in Pakistan to bring in a friendly government.

As Dawn reported on Saturday, US Secretary of State John Kerry skipped a planned visit to Pakistan this week to avoid accusations of meddling in the May 11 elections.

Hours after Secretary Kerry landed in Kabul on an unannounced visit, a senior US official confirmed that he wanted to visit Islamabad as well but did not because Pakistan “enters a very historic period on this electoral process and we wanted to fully respect those institutions and the on-going process.”

US officials, while talking off the record, say that they are aware of “the conspiracy theories circulating in Pakistan” and regret that the Pakistani media “do little to dispel such baseless theories.”

At a recent briefing at the State Department, spokesperson Victoria Nuland also regretted that “the Pakistani people don’t have good information” about US policies towards their country and stressed the “need to work harder to get that message out.”

The message the United States wants to send out during the election season is “we have no favourites among Pakistani politicians and we are looking forward to work with whoever is elected on May 11.”

Secretary Kerry’s decision to skip Pakistan during his South Asia visit is not the only indication of Washington’s eagerness to maintain neutrality during the elections.

In her latest briefing on the Pakistani elections, Ms Nuland pointed out that although under the Kerry-Lugar arrangement, the US has set aside about $6.5 million for helping the electoral process, the fund remains unused because Washington awaits a request from Islamabad.

In private conversations, US officials also dispel the Pakistani perception that the US believes Nawaz Sharif or Imran Khan have links to the Taliban and if they are elected, they will bring in the Taliban.

The US officials point out that Nawaz Sharif is a former prime minister. They have worked with him and do not equate him with religious extremists. Therefore, they will have no problem working with him again if he is re-elected.

Similarly, they do not see Imran Khan as a religious extremist either and will also be willing to work with him if he wins the election.

The US administration, the officials say, will also have no problem working with a PPP-led government if it is re-elected.

But as a Washington think-tank – Centre for Strategic and International Studies – pointed out in a recent report, some Pakistani religious parties do alarm US policy makers. Yet, the Americans know that such parties are unlikely to get more than a handful of seats in the election.

They point out that groups like the Difah-e-Pakistan Council can continue to raise noise against Pakistan’s partnership with the US in the war against terrorism but cannot be an effective player in the political arena.

They also note that efforts to revive the Muttahida Majlis-e-Amal, which ruled the former Northwest Frontier Province from 2002 through 2007, have failed too.

Maulana Tahirul Qadri has also failed to make much of an impact after the first rally that apparently shook Islamabad.

More From This Section

Chinese investors threaten to move capital from KP to Balochistan

A representative of the Chinese investors alleged that an advisor of KP CM, was causing hindrances in the ventures.

Opposition questions privatisation of 32 entities

The opposition parties showed their concerns and staged a symbolic walkout from the Senate against the govt’s decision.

PM calls urgent meeting on national security

Federal ministers, services chiefs, DG IB, ISI and CJCSC are invited to attend the meeting on Thursday, said sources.

Nawaz, Zardari discuss political situation, security

The two also discussed the ongoing operation in Karachi and the dialogue process with Taliban.

Comments are closed.

Comments (13)

anwar kamal
March 26, 2013 9:29 am
But that does mean they have no interest.
Asif Kahsmiri
March 26, 2013 9:58 am
very well said.
March 26, 2013 10:18 am
Why not support Pervez Musharraf's party?
March 26, 2013 10:54 am
March 26, 2013 11:22 am
The US has no favourites? Don't worry about it, neither do we.
March 26, 2013 12:07 pm
If incompetence across the board is all that's needed to keep the Yanks out of meddling then so be it.
March 26, 2013 1:07 pm
john kerry didn't visit pakistan,but he did meet Gen.Kiyani in Jordan a day earlier,as Dawn reported. how now???? What i want is to point out that by just not visiting pakistan at this moment does not mean that the U.S would not influence the forthcoming elections here.
March 26, 2013 1:25 pm
Zardari is their favourite or even Nawaz but not Imran!
March 26, 2013 2:09 pm
Everything US gives is Interest free, but heavy penalty for early withdrawal. "Are you with us or against us" IOU is still out there.
March 26, 2013 3:19 pm
Why can't they stay out of our election process as a whole? Is it neccessary for US to just somehow make statements about our country internal matters?
Fakhr Zaman
March 26, 2013 3:47 pm
If US is not interested in the forth comming elections in Pakistan then why they are puzzle about the religious parties ?
March 26, 2013 4:06 pm
USA has no favorites in Pakistan? Really funny, very funny indeed. Couldn't stop laughing. On the other hand all of the candidates are on US payroll one way or the other so why have a favorite since all of them work for you anyways:)
March 26, 2013 10:35 pm
The heading says that US has no favorites in the 'political' arena. That does not mean it doesnt have favorites in the 'General' arena if you know what I mean.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
From The Newspaper