Children are seen at the Oumar Al-Ard Al-Taalimi Education Centre in Masakin Al-Baladiyah, in Aleppo March 17, 2013. The school for children was founded and is supervised by a group of young activists. -REUTERS

What is a child’s life worth against all the antiquities of Syria? Any reflection of Syria’s architectural disasters must include this question.

The child, a humanitarian must say, is worth all the columns of Palmyra. The child, a cold-hearted historian might suggest, could be sacrificed for the heritage of all future children. Alas, both are being destroyed in Syria.

The inner burning of the Omayyad mosque in Aleppo, the Roman “dead cities” of northern Syria – which have acquired new ghosts as thousands of refugees now hide amid the ruins of antiquity – are the latest victims of the war of archaeology.

And Emma Cunliffe, of Durham University, sums up the dilemma succinctly in the latest issue of British Archeology magazine. If there are 60,000 to 70,000 dead, with winter snow burying refugee tent communities, “what does heritage matter in the face of such tragic desolation”?

Cunliffe, who is developing ways to monitor damage to Middle East archaeological sites, has produced a remarkably even-handed report which lays blame on both the regime and the rebels. While still not on the post-2003 Iraqi scale, “there now appear to be established networks (on the opposition side) that circumvent official inspection .

Seizures of several thousand unmarked artefacts on the Syrian border, including pottery, coins, mosaics, (and) statues suggest the extent of looting could be vast”. Perhaps, Cunliffe says, the trade now stands at more than £1.25 billion.

In Palmyra, however, it appears to be government bullets that have scarred the Roman pillars and government tracks that have used the Roman roads – not unlike the US Humvees which blithely crushed the highways of Babylon in 2003 – while in Homs the Cathedral of Um al-Zennar, one of the city’s oldest churches, “now lies in ruins, its worshippers dead and scattered, its ancient Aramaic liturgy silenced”.

It was one of the world’s oldest churches, its site dating back to AD59. If you want to search for responsibility then you must ask: who was the first to use firearms in this Syrian bloodbath?

Ever since The Independent on Sunday first gave large-scale publicity to the destruction of Syria’s heritage, both sides in the war have used the damage in their own cause. Free Syrian Army officers have vouchsafed to prevent all looting – a dubious claim since the Jordanian markets are now flooded with Syrian gold, mosaics and statues – and have even used Roman Palmyra in a propaganda YouTube video. Produced by the “Media Centre for the city of Tadmor (Palmyra)”, a horseman gallops across the screen bearing the FSA’s green, white and black flag in front of the Roman columns of the city’s Via Maxima.

Interestingly, however, the Syrian government’s own Minister for Antiquities, Professor Maamoun Abdul-Karim, has appealed to all Syrians to protect the country’s architectural treasures because “it is everyone’s responsibility (to) work together to protect those antiquities”. While acknowledging severe damage to some Roman heritage sites in the north, he praises local villagers for driving away looters. The locals, it would appear, realise that a town without antiquities is a town that will never earn tourist money. The minister also assures us that the vast bulk of treasures have been secured in “safe places”. But where are all these “safe places”? And if they are so safe, why do the internally placed refugees not flock to them?

One prominent Lebanese archaeologist tells me, and this one of the most disturbing characteristics of this tragic treasure-hunt, is that the smugglers are now working for the same networks created by the Iraqi looters. A taste for treasures has now been acquired internationally – and buyers are asking Iraqi gangs to use the same methods in Syria. The Washington Post has been investigating rebel smuggling trails, and insurgents told the paper that an average haul can net $50,000 for weapons purchases.

“Some days we are fighters; others we are archaeologists,” an Idlib rebel told the paper.

Several archaeologists (the legal kind) have suggested that their approaches to Nato – even the British Ministry of Defence – led to attempts by pilots to avoid damaging Roman heritage sites in Libya in 2011, switching munitions to avoid shrapnel spray while targeting Qadhafi’s legions. But there are no Nato planes over Syria, and I doubt if Syrian government pilots carry Minister Abdul-Karim’s appeal in their cockpits. So the same old question: what is a child’s life worth?

By arrangement with The Independent


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Comments (0) (Closed)