A view of Supreme Court of Pakistan. — File Photo

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Saturday assailed the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) for not implementing the court’s orders on delimitation of Karachi constituencies, DawnNews reported.

The larger bench of the apex court, in its 27-page interim verdict of the Karachi unrest case, noted that the remarks given on delimitation issue were not just observations but were part of the judgement and are needed to be implemented.

The bench was comprised of Justices Anwar Zaheer Jamali, Khilji Arif Hussain, Sarmad Jalal Osmani, Gulzar Ahmed and Athar Saeed.

The court had observed on Nov 26 that constituencies in Karachi should be delimited in a manner that they comprise “mixed population” to avoid political polarisation.

The bench noted that conducting free, fair, transparent and impartial elections in the country was the election commission’s responsibility.

The order, in which constitutional articles were also elaborated, contains statement of the ECP secretary along with a detailed note of Justice Khilji Arif Hussain.

The order says that Delimitation of Constituencies Act, 1974 empowers the ECP to delimit the constituencies even with the absence of fresh census.

It also elaborated Article 51 of the Constitution, sub-section 2 of which is only related to the allocation of seats in provincial assemblies and the national assembly and stated that it had nothing to do with the delimitation process.

The plea of the ECP is not in accordance with the law as the election commission apparently does not seem interested in implementing the Supreme Court’s orders, said the written order.

Justice Khilji Arif Hussain, in his additional note, wrote that the ECP was responsible for conducting transparent and impartial elections in the country.

Delimitation of the constituencies should be conducted with regards to the distribution of population geographically and keeping in view the existing boundaries of administrative units, it said.

The order added that pleas of both Muttahida Qaumi Movement and Muhajir Qaumi Movement were rejected because they did not pursue them further.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.