A governance crisis

Published Jan 26, 2013 09:09pm

Dr Abid Suleri talks to Moniza Inam on various aspects of the problem.

Dr Suleri is the executive director, Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI), social policy analyst and a development practitioner. Here, he gives his expert opinion on the subject affecting the masses.

Can you please elaborate why Pakistan has not been able to feed its population despite having an agriculture-based economy?

Firstly, we are no longer an agro-based economy. Services sector is the largest contributor of our gross domestic product (GDP). In agriculture our focus remained (and still is) on increased food production and enhanced productivity. This partially tackled the issue of physical availability, yet the issue of socio-economic access to food remained the biggest problem. Over the years, one saw some improvement in food production followed by increased prices.

In 2008, Pakistan was the sixth largest producer of wheat and the ninth largest wheat exporter, yet wheat prices doubled in that particular year. Even now, while we have sufficient wheat stored in our reserves, the prices of flour have shot up to Rs42 per kg from Rs33 per kg. Lack of employment opportunities, energy crisis (which has deprived the people of their existing income assets), natural and man-made disasters especially recent floods, inflation, withdrawal of subsidies on agro-inputs and more importantly governance crisis are the major contributors towards increased hunger. I believe that hunger in the wake of abundant production of food is merely a governance crisis.

What policies and measures did the government introduce to reduce hunger and malnourishment?

There are (and were) many stand-alone initiatives such as the Benazir Income Support Programme, Baitul-Mal, Rural Support Programmes and Poverty Reduction Strategy Papers. In March 2012, Yousuf Raza Gilani, the then prime minister, initiated the National Zero Hunger Programme for the 45 worst food-insecure districts. However, that programme never took off and became a victim of a bureaucratic tussle between the ministry of national food security and research (MNFSR) and the ministry of finance.

The launch of Zero Hunger Programme had symbolic significance as the prime minister admitted on record that 48.6 per cent of people in the country were extremely food insecure. Barring that occasion, our policymakers are in a constant state of denial. Citing bumper production of wheat, milk and export of rice, they simply rule out that food insecurity is an issue in the country. The mindset to deny existence of a problem coupled with governance issues is the root cause of all policy failures against hunger and malnourishment.

Does the government plan to invest in agriculture research to achieve better self sufficiency in food production?

There are a few issues here. First the contribution of agriculture to GDP is declining, so investment in agriculture is no more a public or private priority. Second, there is a complete disconnect among agricultural universities, applied research centres and field extension services. Third, there is no research on improved food storage, agricultural marketing and measures to improve access to food. Weak coordination between federal and provincial governments in the context of devolution of ministry of food, agriculture and livestock is yet another hurdle in bridging research-policy-practice gap.

Can you explain the political and social implications of food insecurity on society and national cohesion?

‘Insecurity breeds insecurity’ is true in case of food insecurity as well. In the absence of an effective social safety net mechanism and in the presence of huge income inequalities, food insecure individuals may resort to extraordinary behaviours. Some of these deeds include violent and destructive protests for basic amenities such as uninterrupted supply of electricity, natural gas and water; resorting to industrial action (which may turn violent); organ trade, putting children on sale; resorting to various criminal activities (theft, burglary, petty and street crimes, robbery, kidnapping for ransom, etc.); and forcing women into prostitution and kids into child labour.

In extreme cases, some people commit suicide and/or kill all their family members and a few may fall prey to the Jihadi propaganda of militant groups by becoming suicide bombers and militant fighters. All these behaviours not only promote intolerance and violence, they also lead to socio-political instability. Due to Pakistan’s peculiar geo-strategic situation, any socio-political instability has the potential to create a situation where regional or global players may want to intervene.

At meso level, perception of individual marginalisation, social vulnerability, social exclusion and individual food insecurity may lead to social conflict and contest over scarce resources as and when individual insecurity takes on a collective identity — be it ethnicity, creed, gender, sect, class, or regional. This may lead to social instability and may erode the basic societal fabric when it turns violent. The fact that this is already taking place in today’s Pakistan is there for everyone to see in the cases of urban violence in Karachi, increased street crimes in central Punjab and militancy in Balochistan.

The socio-political instability leading to violence not only threatens national security but also regional (and at times global) security. The international community gets concerned that a nuclear state has limited or no writ over its violent groups and global and regional forces start doubting the state’s capability to protect its nuclear weapons. This leads to regional and global interference in the country’s affairs, which in turn provides a solid excuse and rationale for enhanced national security measures (and increased spending on them).


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

The brown bigots

There may be no overt displays but racism is very much alive in the most educated households as well.

A cross-border fashion jaunt

Over 80 designers showed at LFW this time and three among these were selected by Hello! Pakistan and POPxo.com in India.

Comments (4) (Closed)


Aurangzeb
Jan 27, 2013 03:14pm
Dr Suleri, the executive director, Sustainable Development Policy Institute (SDPI) is totally misleading by giving the impression that Pakistan is NOT an Agriculture economy. Actually, we are nothing BUT AN AGRICULTURE economy, We have no manufacturing and what little manufacturing we have is Cotton which is also Agro-based. Cotton is sown, looked after and then harvested on Agri-land. Second, most of is not all or service industry is around Agri-products. Just look around you and you will see Food and Clothing - both as a result of our farmers toiling. So I beg to differ with Dr. Suleri and his starting assumptions that we are not an agro-based country. Increase our Agro-productivity, given farmers their fair share in infrastructure and keep hoaders and middle-men away and you'll see Pakistan become a net exporter of Food. Perhaps this is our problem. We see the world upside down. We want people to see what we are not and afraid to admit what we are...Aurangzeb Bhatti
Cyrus Howell
Jan 27, 2013 12:55pm
God willing, God will provide. Wink. Wink. I wish Pakistan the best of luck. Wink Wink. I just don't think keeping my fingers crossed will do the trick.
Cyrus Howell
Jan 27, 2013 12:50pm
" I believe that hunger in the wake of abundant production of food is merely a governance crisis... ...Citing bumper production of wheat, milk and export of rice, they simply rule out that food insecurity is an issue in the country... " A similar situation in China was the cause of the Chinese Cultural Revolution. Agricultural production was overseen by the Red Guard, and middle schools, colleges and universities were put on lock down for ten years. Bureaucrats and professors were blamed for the break down in food production. Teachers and professors had nothing to do with the famine, but they became China's scapegoats. Chairman Mao and Jhou En-Lai let them take the fall in order to remain in power.
Junaid Hashmat
Jan 27, 2013 06:22pm
Reasons for failure of Democracy and Government given by Shahab-ud-din commission are still prevailing in Pakistan. 1) The self aggrandizment of greedy and knavish politician. 2) Abscence of well organized political parties. ( Because of no intra-party elections ) 3) Lack of dedicated leadership. Wow ! what a far sighted person he was. Long live cracked and self centered politicians of Pakistan ! Pakistan may ALLAH save you. Ameen