Zardari_670_2
President Asif Ali Zardari. — File photo

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court (LHC) on Tuesday heard the contempt of court petition against President Asif Ali Zardari for not relinquishing the political office of PPP co-chairman, DawnNews reported.

A full bench, headed by Chief Justice Umar Ata Bandial, heard the case.

During the hearing, Wasim Sajjad, the federation’s counsel, stated that the president enjoyed complete immunity under the Constitution.

Sajjad reiterated that the court had expressed its "hope" that the president would relinquish one of the offices, adding that in that case not quitting one of the posts was not tantamount to committing contempt of court.

He added that since the president enjoyed immunity from prosecution, a contempt petition against him should not be entertained.

Responding to which, the bench said if the head of state had done something unlawful or wrong, impeachment was an option.

The bench added that the Constitution did not grant full immunity to the president.

The hearing was later adjourned to Feb 6.

The petition

Earlier on Sept 5, 2012, the bench had issued a fresh notice to President Zardari through his principal secretary and had sought a reply to the petition pleading contempt proceedings against him for not abiding a court order to relinquish his political office.

The petition that had been filed by Munir Ahmad through lawyers A K Dogar and Azhar Siddique had accused President Zardari of indulging in political activities in the presidency. It had stated that the president had neither disassociated himself from the political office nor had he stopped ‘misusing’ the President House despite a verdict by the Lahore High Court’s full bench against the dual-office.

The petitioner had also contended that the use of Presidency for political activities was illegal and tantamount to committing contempt of the court’s orders issued on May 12, 2011. He had also requested the court to issue a show-cause notice to the president and punish him under Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003, read with Article 204 of the Constitution.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.