Stagnating aspect of UK academic case

Published Jan 16, 2013 12:15am

I WAS offered a seat on MSc Finance and Financial Law at School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, in September 2005. However, in my case, enrollment was allowed in September 2006. Although I earned distinction in the initial Statistics examination, the alleged bias in the casuistic nature of examination marking became evidentially alerting from the first Law examinations’ result.

The Law paper was examined by three different professors of distinguished law schools, including, of course, SOAS at the time. External professors awarded merit and distinction marks where somehow a professor from SOAS, Mr Richard Alexander, awarded failure. Upon inquiry, the reason given was strict: “You must always answer the question with precision”.

Even a slight deviation in answering at SOAS is intolerable.

Besides having sought the advice on the essay writing skill aspect of the financial module(s) by Professor S. Pasquale on the above-mentioned issue and other academic standards of Law, LTU, the department set up as an authority by SOAS, was consulted.

Their advice was followed in five law examinations/assignments where four were to be judged by the same professor, Mr Alexander, alone.

My identity was known in only one where I failed. However, surprisingly, in the other four papers I was awarded close merit (one) and merit marks (remaining).

The reason on the emphasis is that the approach in all five examinations was purposefully unanimous and consistent. However, the reason of failure was given or perhaps rested on the conflict between the advice of the LTU and the above-mentioned finance professor.

Somehow not being enough in the following module, another finance teacher, Mr A. Fabrizio, awarded mere pass for ‘focusing too much on the question’, followed by another mere pass stating an unfathomable excuse. The matter obviously proceeded to the court. However, perhaps for the purpose of expediency, it remained restricted to academic authorities and/or academic values.

The stagnating aspect of the case was the fact that the barrister, having filed the claim of his choice, later changed his opinion and had my funding revoked. In his stated opinion, 51 to 60 per cent chance of success for a civil claim was unsatisfactory.

I had to return to Pakistan and the English court decided in SOAS’s favour. The request from the court was not for mere damages alone but for the specific performance as well as the degree.

I am still hopeful of getting my degree. Newspaper readers’ opinions are most welcome.

JAHANZEB JAWAID Karachi

More From This Section

RIP Haris Suleman

I WAS saddened to hear the news of Haris Suleman’s death, the 17-year-old Pakistani-American pilot, who made an...

Learning from Dutch

The recent tragedy of Malaysian Airlines Flight 17 was shocking as well as avoidable. Close to 300 people lost their...

Ending terrorism

Maj-Gen Asim Bajwa recently said: “This is the beginning of the end of terrorism in the country” and the ongoing...

Comments (7) (Closed)


Hanbal
Jan 16, 2013 09:19am
1) SOAS is not one of the best Universities ( Imperial, UCL and Kings are in the Russel group). 2) Incorrect use of the word stagnating. 3) How is this personal experience pertinent to a national newspaper? From an Oxford graduate.
Javed
Jan 16, 2013 10:45am
Dear Rihat, I think the comment is a bit unfair. I respect your experience, but based on the info above it does not seem that the candidate under question is below borderline. At times, we need to trust that our fellowman is speaking the truth!
akhtar
Jan 16, 2013 12:03pm
It is unfortunate the writer had bad experiences at SOAS specially from Prof. Alexander. To make the situation worse, the candidate also did not receive good grades from other two examiners. Further, the lack of coherency is indicative of writer's frustratio. There may still some room for a happy resolution. In my view the candidate he should approach the SOAS authorities for a re-review of his previous exam papers or be granted a re-write all exams, which to be marked by recognized and respectable three independednt (external to SOAS) faculty members. Good luck
Hanbal
Jan 16, 2013 01:02pm
Angrezi ka imtihan baishak Urdu main lay lo. Lol
trollberg63
Jan 16, 2013 10:00am
How could they pass someone who cant even write a letter coherently? They are not under obligation to pass you just because you have paid fees.
Rihat
Jan 16, 2013 07:13am
Passing degrees at any of the distinguished London Universities is not easy. I with my daughter are products of Imperial College and LSE and have no complaints at all. These institutions together with SOAS are undeniably fair but do not waste time on below borderline candidates.
akk
Jan 16, 2013 07:31pm
Gods will ..