IS Pakistan going to face a Siachen-like situation in Sir Creek? The Hindustan Times report last month was highly alarming.

According to the newspaper, India is going to erect a floating fence anchored by submerged metallic mashes along the Sir Creek border area with Pakistan.

That too India is not realising that it cannot do any kind of activity on its own because the 96km-long border area is disputed between Pakistan and India. Unless it is resolved amicably or otherwise, both the countries should not, under the 1914 Bombay Resolution, take any kind of unilateral step and resolve the issue within the same parameters.

According to a report published in The Hindustan Times last month, Narindra Modi of India had announced he would initiate two major projects, while erecting a floating ‘gabion box’ fence; the work on which is reportedly going to start with two construction companies given the contract by Indian government, i.e., National Buildings Construction Cooperation (NBCC) and Central Public Works Department (CPWD).

The Pakistan army has recently reprioritised the internal threat as the number one threat to Pakistan’s security. Before that India was the number one threat, thanks to the increasingly normalising relations with the all-time adversary. Under such circumstances no sinister move from the Indian side should have been expected. But such a unilateral decision reminds us that we should ever be cautious.

If one differentiates between a dispute and an issue, I would categorise Kashmir as a dispute and Sir Creek as an issue between Pakistan and India. Of all the issues, Sir Creek has been the simplest one that could have been resolved only as a confidence-building measure. Benazir and Musharraf governments were reportedly close to resolving the Siachen and Sir Creek issues, but probably the Indian intransigence did not give a way.

It is still not late. The Sir Creek issue has to be resolved mutually, as well as amicably, so that the process of bringing two peoples closer is not stopped and the common threat to this region, i.e., terrorism, is countered and defeated with full force.

Both the countries submitted their claims to the UN for increasing the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) area through claiming continental shelf in 2009. These claims cannot be approved unless both countries are able to resolve sea boundary issues with each other.

If not resolved, the two will again come to the collision course, with which the populace on both sides would badly suffer.

And if EEZ is not approved, it would affect the economic activity, peace and stability -- a dream that the leadership on both sides wishes to come true. The international community should also facilitate Pakistan-India talks to amicably resolve the maritime boundary issue as early as possible, before it triggers and become counterproductive.

MARYA MUFTY Lahore

More From This Section

Pakistani dramas

IN almost every drama serial, I see a ‘baychari’ (deprived) woman who is often beaten up by her husband or one ...

White is black

A SALARIED private militia maintained by Nawab Akbar Bugti had killed 231 security personnel of our army, FC, police...

Living in fear

I REMEMBER going to see my grandparents in southern Punjab every summer holiday. Unlike many other schoolchildren, I...

CNG supply

THE government recently announced that there would now be a continuous supply to CNG stations in Punjab, with a...


Comments are closed.

Comments (4)

Kumar
January 15, 2013 12:34 pm
Before jumping to any conclusion, writer should find out why India is building this boundary. There is confusion for fisherman where is India/Pakistan boundary. Hundred of fishermen are arrested regularly on both side . This boundary will provide guidance to these poor fishermen who get stuck in jails for years. This is right thing to do. Some Pakistanis always look for wrong angle of any issue.
SK
January 15, 2013 11:30 am
Certainly disputes and issues can and should be resolved to bring lasting peace in the subcontinent. The problem is what is the resolution to these disputes. Certainly Pakistani leaders were close to resolving disputes. The only hitch was that they were ready to do so under the assumption that India would have to accept whatever Pakistan proposed as the resolution. So please cut this crap that Pakistani leaders were and are ready to resolve disputes. They neither were nor are.
AHMED
January 15, 2013 3:40 pm
thr is difrnt in percption nd realilty only few can look wrting on walls
Rao
January 16, 2013 2:43 am
Siachen is a bigger issue...Compared to it Sir Creek is nothing.....Pakistan's attitude continues----first sort out Kashmir, then everything else..
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page