Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari.—File Photo

LAHORE: A heated argument occurred between Chief Justice of Lahore High Court (LHC) Umar Ata Bandial and Attorney General Irfan Qadir during Wednesday’s hearing of a contempt of court petition over the dual offices held by President Asif Ali Zardari, DawnNews reported.

A five-member bench, headed by Justice Bandial, was hearing the case. Other members of the bench include Justice Nasir Saeed Sheikh, Justice Sheikh Najmul Hassan, Justice Ijazul Ahsan and Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah.

A heated exchange of remarks took place between Justice Bandial and Attorney General Qadir at the beginning of the hearing.

The attorney general maintained that President Zardari was an elected president, adding that, the Constitution did not allow for any curbs on the political activities of the president.

Attorney General Qadir moreover criticised the court’s decision on the case pertaining to the construction of the ‘controversial’ Kalabagh dam.

Responding to which, the LHC chief justice said anyone who had any objections to or reservations over the court’s decision on the dam should challenge the ruling instead of attacking the court.

The hearing was in progress until the filing of this report.

The petition

On Sept 5, the bench had issued a fresh notice to President Zardari through his principal secretary and had sought a reply to the petition pleading contempt proceedings against him for not abiding the court’s order to relinquish his political office.

The petition that had been filed by Munir Ahmad through lawyers A K Dogar and Azhar Siddique had accused President Zardari of indulging in political activities in the presidency. It had stated that the president had neither disassociated himself from the political office nor had he stopped ‘misusing’ the President House despite a verdict by the Lahore High Court’s full bench against the dual office.

The petitioner had also contended that the use of Presidency for political activities was illegal and tantamount to committing contempt of the court’s orders issued on May 12 last year. He had also requested the court to issue a show-cause notice to the president and punish him under Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003, read with Article 204 of the Constitution.

More From This Section

Bombers’ trail leads to arrests from guava farm in south Punjab

Officials said they are comparing the bombers’ modus operandi with that of TTP and UBA in Islamabad Sabzi Mandi blast.

Federal cabinet meeting approves import of electricity, LNG

The meeting presided by premier Sharif also discussed the future of talks between the government and Taliban.

MQM holds protests as two more bodies recovered

Two trussed-up bodies of missing MQM workers were recovered near Korangi Creek in Karachi's Qayyumabad area.

One security man killed, two injured in attack near Peshawar

One security person was killed and two others were injured as militants attacked a security forces’ vehicle.

Comments are closed.

Comments (4)

December 19, 2012 1:23 pm
Pardon me, but perhaps that is not the SC's job. There exists a Constitutionally defined role of the SC, and there also exist Constitutional limits to what the SC can do, and to top it all there remains the very important practice of judicial restraint. Unfortunately, the current judiciary seems to have forgotten all of these.
December 19, 2012 8:22 am
Pakistani Judiciary is a joke... All political cases and petitions are being entertained whilst the masses are suffering from the corrupt practices and delays in the Judicial system.
December 19, 2012 10:51 am
SC is doing its job to get rid of corrupt politicians including President of Pakistan who took the nation at verge of bankrupcy. Keep it up SC bravo.................
December 19, 2012 2:42 pm
Bilal,you are an ignorant fellow. All good and bad starts from the top and until the top is corrupt, no measure can curb the corruption in the bottom
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
From The Newspaper