INSTEAD of aiming for a speedy resolution to the benefit of all, the tussle over the post of executive director at the Higher Education Commission has been allowed to drag on — unfortunately, the normal course of affairs in Pakistan. HEC chairperson Dr Javaid Laghari believes that the commission had the right to extend the tenure of Dr Sohail Naqvi as executive director, which it did on Aug 27 this year; the government, however, gave the additional charge of executive director HEC to the secretary, Ministry of Education and Training, Qamar Zaman Chaudhry. Meanwhile, the HEC invited applications for the post of executive director through advertisement, but a day before the Aug 28 deadline, it deferred the recruitment process and extended Dr Naqvi’s contract. According to Dr Laghari, this was because the commission came to know about a ban on new appointments in the management pay scale category, under which the executive director is employed.

In all this, it is the future of the HEC and the spending of billions on higher education that it oversees that is at stake. If quarters within the HEC have concerns that the commission’s autonomy may be undermined, these are not unfounded. The direction in which it is headed has remained confused since it was decided that in the wake of the 18th Amendment, the HEC should be split up into provincial units. In June, the government decided to give administrative and financial control of the commission to the Ministry of Professional and Technical Training. It is true that devolution makes certain demands on several institutions, including the HEC — which the latter is resisting. But while the commission’s detractors may have some fair points, it nevertheless is one of the few institutions with a good track record. While reform is necessary, particularly on the issues of audits, plagiarism and transparency, it should be progressive and participatory, and the government should not tamper with that which works. The country’s concerns about primary and secondary education, quality, etc, notwithstanding — and the state must step up efforts in these contexts — higher education is far too important a sector to demolish merely for a slice of the pie.

More From This Section

Life without dignity

CAN a family survive with dignity on the minimum wage of an unskilled worker, asked the Supreme Court on Monday in...

One-way ‘talks’

IN the ebb and flow of negotiations between the federal government and the outlawed TTP, the government appears to...

Parveen Rehman case

MANIPULATION has been found written all over the Karachi police’s tackling of the murder of Parveen Rehman, the...

Conspiracy theories

NOTHING ever changes in Balochistan it seems. On Sunday, Sanaullah Zehri, senior provincial minister, expanded on...


Comments are closed.

Comments (2)

M. Asghar
December 7, 2012 5:00 pm
The rules concerning the operation of the HEC should be clear to avoid this confusing and harmful interference from different quarters.
Riaz Akbar
December 7, 2012 6:48 am
I watched capital talk show on power tussle. It reflects dichotomy on part of HEC that firstly it advertises post of executive director then all of a sudden it changes its mind about granting third extension of four years to Dr Sohail Naqvi on the plea on ban on direct induction in MP scale. No one is indispensable in Pakistan as many substitutes are available in HEC. I also suggest that HEC must be restructured in the light of 18th amendment forthwith as six months have already lapsed.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page