AN eminent former editor of the Oxford English Dictionary covertly deleted thousands of words because of their foreign origins and bizarrely blamed previous editors, according to claims in a book published this week.
Robert Burchfield’s efforts to rewrite the dictionary have been uncovered by Sarah Ogilvie, a linguist, lexicographer and former editor on the OED.
Ogilvie’s book, Words of the World, challenges the widely held belief that editors of the OED between 1884 and 1933 were Anglocentric Oxford dons obsessed with preserving the Queen’s English, and that it was not until Robert Burchfield’s four supplements, produced between 1972 and 1986, that the dictionary was opened up to the wider world.
“I observed a pattern, that actually it was the earlier editors who were dealing with words in a really enlightened way. They certainly weren’t these Anglocentric, judging kind of editors — they were very sensitive to cultural differences and they seemed to be putting in a lot of foreign words and a lot of words from different varieties of English, which must have been amazing for that day when colonial varieties of English were just emerging,” said Ogilvie.
She undertook a detailed analysis of Burchfield’s supplement, comparing it with the 1933 supplement by Charles Onions and William Craigie. She found that, far from opening up the OED to foreign linguistic influences, Burchfield had deleted 17 per cent of the ‘loanwords’ and world English words that had been included by Onions, who included 45 per cent more foreign words than Burchfield.
Examples of Burchfield’s deleted words include ‘balisaur’, an Indian badger-like animal; the American English ‘wake-up’, a golden-winged woodpecker; ‘boviander’, the name in British Guyana for a person of mixed race living on the river banks; and ‘danchi’, a Bengali shrub. The OED is now re-evaluating words expunged by Burchfield, who died in 2004, aged 81.
“This is really shocking. If a word gets into the OED, it never leaves. If it becomes obsolete, we put a dagger beside it, but it never leaves,” Ogilvie said.
In tracing the discrepancy back to its origins, she found that the dictionary’s first editor, James Murray, in the 19th century, was harshly criticised for including contributions by correspondents from as far away as Ceylon, Mexico and New Zealand. One reviewer wrote: “There is no surer or more fatal sign of the decay of a language than in the interpolation of barbarous terms and foreign words.”
But Murray pressed on, as, later, did Onions, helped by readers from around the world.
As well as Americanisms and other regional variations in English, there were also those which entered English globally, such as ‘typhoon’, ‘okra’, ‘abattoir’, ‘svelte’ and ‘bamboo’, or those restricted to a particular region, for example ‘pak pai’ in Hong Kong, which is a car used illegally as a taxi.
The first version of the OED, released in 1884, contained words from all round the world, from ‘aard-vark’ and ‘aard-wolf’ to ‘acacia’.
The myth that the dictionary’s early editors were Anglocentric originates, believes Ogilvie, with Burchfield himself. “The only way I can explain him doing it is that, in the scholarly word of linguistics, the 1970s was when the first work on varieties of English started to come about.”
A spokesperson for the OED’s publisher Oxford University Press said one of the dictionary’s current policies was “to re-evaluate any terms which were left out of the supplement by Burchfield” and it was constantly adding new words “from every corner of the English-speaking world”.
The spokesperson added that Burchfield “was insistent that the dictionary should expand its coverage of international words in English and, although he omitted minor terms from the supplement which he was revising and extending, he added many thousands of more fully researched international entries”. — The Guardian, London