HIGH drama was witnessed on Thursday when Interior Minister Rehman Malik announced that motorcycles would not be allowed to ply the roads of Karachi and Quetta on Friday, the first day of Muharram. In its turn, the Sindh High Court, responding to a petition, swung into action late Thursday night, suspending the interior minister’s ban. While Karachi’s million-plus motorcyclists must have been pleased with the court’s intervention, the Balochistan government decided to implement Mr Malik’s order, though the ban was challenged in the Balochistan High Court on Friday. The action against two-wheelers was taken due to fears that motorcycles may be used in acts of terrorism; Mr Malik told the Senate on Friday that motorbikes had been used to carry out over 400 bombings across the country. And in what now appears to have become standard operating procedure during any major religious occasion or whenever there are heightened threats of terrorism, cellphone services in Karachi and Quetta were also suspended on Friday.

These methods are arbitrary and unlikely to counter terrorism in a big way. They are easy ways for the government to wriggle out of its responsibility of maintaining law and order. The logic behind the motorcycle ban is shaky; if tomorrow there are intelligence reports that cars or trucks will be used in acts of terrorism, will the state order all vehicles off the road? True, perhaps the SHC should have acted more prudently and listened to the government’s view before suspending the ban as it is not clear whether the court was aware of the threat level. Nevertheless, while various remedies have been given for the security situation, especially in Karachi, and have included Senator Raza Rabbani’s impractical solutions, little has been done to beef up intelligence-gathering and counterterrorism efforts. These would be far more effective than stopgap measures which paralyse daily life.

More From This Section

Too much for too little

THERE is no deadlock, Interior Minister Nisar Ali Khan had told the country regarding talks with the outlawed TTP....

The name of the game

WHAT’S in a name? A lot, it turns out, at least in the case of a proscribed organisation that wants to participate...

Roles reversed

THE story has been repeated ad nauseam over the decades, but is still a favourite with many Pakistanis who bemoan...

Life without dignity

CAN a family survive with dignity on the minimum wage of an unskilled worker, asked the Supreme Court on Monday in...

Comments are closed.

Comments (4)

Sue Sturgess
November 17, 2012 2:26 am
Terrorists can also drive cars, take trains, be pedestrians etc. They might currently use bikes because they are convenient, but if bikes are banned, other methods of transport / delivery will be found.
November 17, 2012 3:13 pm
The honorable and extremely competent interior minster cannot be blamed, as he normally is constrained to speak with his feet in his mouth. Besides we must not blame the mentally challenged its not good form.
Agha Ata
November 17, 2012 4:12 pm
What about three wheelers? Isn?t it easier to shoot sitting in a rickshaw? But so are the four wheelers. I suggest Mr. Rehman Malick should Bann one wheelers. At least nobody would be offended. :(
Iftikhar Husain
November 17, 2012 12:43 pm
It is better not to comment on Mr Malik he says lot of things but nothing happens.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Front Page