AS a peaceful protest, the Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf’s anti-drone march fell well within democratic norms. What was also clear, though, is that its motive was election-era politics rather than confronting the roots of the problem itself. While roundly criticising the Pakistani and US administrations, the party focused far less on the fact that Pakistan’s drone policy, whatever it may be, is being carried out with the approval of the Pakistani army and the cooperation of Pakistani intelligence. So while it may have been effective political propaganda, whether or not the protest will put pressure on those really responsible for the drones mess is questionable.

The frustrating truth is that the real nature of America and Pakistan’s agreement, or lack thereof, on the drones programme is growing more, not less, murky. The conventional wisdom seemed to be that a programme that was once jointly conducted by the two countries, at least in terms of intelligence-sharing and Pakistan providing a physical base, had now become one conducted by the US without Pakistan’s involvement. But a series of reports in Western media outlets are now claiming that Pakistan is still given some knowledge of upcoming drone strikes. Even then, there is no consensus on the extent of the information provided — whether it is just an indication of the broad area within which strikes will take place or an actual list of targets — or on whether or not Pakistan acknowledges receiving the information. The bottom line is that the extent of collaboration remains behind a veil of secrecy that neither the US nor Pakistan governments and intelligence agencies seem eager to lift.

Nor is it clear whether or not the drones are legal — partly because it is unclear how much consent Pakistan provides — how targets are selected, or how militants are distinguished from civilians present in areas where militant activities are being plotted or carried out. All of which has turned drones into a genuine human-rights issue of great sensitivity for many Pakistanis. That in turn means the programme has become a lightning rod for anti-US sentiment and is also being used to support the argument that military action is not the solution in even Fata’s most militant-infested parts. Until the Pakistani military makes a genuine effort to root out militants from the tribal areas, or the government develops a joint mechanism with the US for conducting the programme and shares it with the public, the controversy over drones could derail the objective of cleansing the tribal areas of militants who threaten not only other countries, but Pakistan itself.

More From This Section

More than money needed

IF it weren’t for the history and the present context, it would have been a grand announcement. Balochistan, Prime...

Measuring poverty

POLITICALLY, poverty has been a sensitive issue in Pakistan, as it has been in many other developing countries. It ...

Lure of the blue passport

PASSPORT and visa issues continue to occupy our leaders. The latest evidence of this came on Friday when members of...

Yet another chance

WITH the government determined to have a dialogue with the TTP come what may, the rest of the stakeholders have...


Comments are closed.

Comments (7)

Joseph Raju
October 10, 2012 2:14 am
Drone attacks are the joint undertaking by US and Pakistan Army, irrespective of disclaimers. Since the convetional fight is not feasible, this is the best stratgey both countries agreed which also saves tons of money. The activists or the hooligans came there to protest are the stooges of the U.S. president. Any protest in the US will make the president very uncomfortable, especially in the thick of the election season. So, they changed the venue. Pakistan should ask these people to return to US. P. Joseph Raju
Iftikhar Husain
October 9, 2012 11:14 am
The editorial is to the point totally agree.
Does not matter
October 9, 2012 8:29 pm
Do you think Government has any say in Defense and Foreign policies?
S.S.VERMA
October 9, 2012 2:45 am
Shrouded in Secrecy ++++++++++++++++ I iamgined that the Editorial was about the much hyped Abbottabad Report:)
Amjad Wyne
October 9, 2012 1:09 pm
Editorial states, "Pakistan?s drone policy, whatever it may be, is being carried out with the approval of the Pakistani army and the cooperation of Pakistani intelligence."...Are you suggesting that Pakistan has no government? or that the Pakistan government is jointly sidelined by the US and the Pakistani Army.
M. Asghar
October 9, 2012 8:42 am
The PTI march against the drones affair whatever its real motifs, was a worthwhile thing, because it adds pressure on the concerned authorities to come out of the harmful ambiguity.
AL-HILAL
October 9, 2012 9:59 am
Thank you DAWN for spelling the truth out so clearly.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Cartoons
E-PAPER
Front Page