IN 2009 a complete list of bank defaulters was floated in the press and electronic media. The same kind of report was also submitted to the Supreme Court.

It was expected that the apex court will take up the matter earnestly and bring to book the businessmen, political leaders, retired army men, and journalists who were among over 3,300 people who got Rs153.5 billion loans written off from 11 financial institutions between 1999 and 2007.

However, it is disappointing to note that this matter of great national interest has been left in abeyance for some unknown reasons and the defaulters, as well as their counterpart bankers, have been rent scot-free without any accountability.

Since the Supreme Court has just ordered NAB in the containers’ case to either recover the case amount from the accused or in the event of failure to do that bear the markup on its own.

It would be fully justified if the Supreme Court also passed a similar order against the above bank loan defaulters and their accessory financial institutions and ordered NAB or the financial institutions concerned to bear the mark-up on the bungled-up huge amount of Rs152.5 billion if they failed to recover the same in grace time awarded by the court.

Unless quick adjudication is held, it is feared that the nation will lose this precious parcel of national exchequer and that might reflect on the role of the Supreme Court in handling cases according to norms of the law, justice and equity.


More From This Section

PPO’s implications

The Protection of Pakistan Ordinance (PPO) grants sweeping powers of arrest and detention to security forces. We ...

Intolerant society

A NUMBER of incidents during the last couple of weeks have shattered the peace of my mind. One was a gang-rape...

Drug abuse

THE surfacing of drug-abuse statistics in Pakistan by Drug Use in Pakistan, 2013, has shocked legal and medical...

Retirees’ appointment

APROPOS your news report, “Retirees` reappointment goes against SC orders” (April 13), by reappointing retired...

Comments are closed.

Comments (3)

September 9, 2012 1:02 pm
Although SC has already taken action on this issue but what will it bring when the executive of the country think that they are above the law and can get away with any SC orders. Do you say anything about the cases currently being run against the government especially of corruption and gov has put their level best efforts to subdue the judiciary and so far they have been successful in their efforts. So what is your point! You may want to try your luck with international courts of justice.
September 9, 2012 5:26 pm
Writing off a loan is part of a Bank's business. It is not a courts job to decide these matters and interfere in agreements between Banks and their borrowers. However, in cases where use of political influence is used to write-off loans and the intent of the Borrower is not to execute any project, the culprits must be punished by the Courts.
Muhammad Alvi
September 9, 2012 10:32 am
The SC has already taken action on this, but the SC can only order. The SC order was applicable to Zardari, and we know the result.
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Front Page