Interim set-up

Published Aug 16, 2012 12:10am

INCLUDING the non-parliamentary opposition in the consultative process on the establishment of a caretaker set-up to oversee general elections is a positive idea and should broaden the dialogue space. Speaking to Dawn on Tuesday, Yousuf Raza Gilani said the ruling party had decided in principle to involve the Jamaat-i-Islami and Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf in talks to decide on the establishment of a pre-election interim cabinet, and that consultations would begin “soon”. Coming from a former prime minister, who is also the PPP’s senior vice chairman, the initiative deserves to be welcomed in a crisis-prone country that lacks strong constitutional institutions and democratic traditions. The JI and the PTI should welcome the offer, because both of them have a stake in the coming election and in the kind of set-up that will organise it. Even though these two parties boycotted the 2008 election — and they may well be ruing their decision — both of late have been reaching out to the people in a way that appears to give the impression of an election campaign. Their ideas and suggestions, therefore, deserve to be heard and made part of the consensus on a truly neutral prime minister tasked with organising an election whose transparency would not be questioned.

Against this background, opposition leader Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan dwelt more on technicalities when he said there was no need at this point for talks with the government because the 20th Amendment had clearly laid down the procedure for choosing a caretaker set-up. Yet he said his party would hold consultations after Eid on the same issue with opposition parties, including those outside parliament. If the 20th Amendment does not stand in the way of the PML-N’s talks with the PTI — despite the “bitterness” he spoke of — there is no reason why it should stop his party from talking to the government in an amicable manner to sort out an issue in which all parties have stakes.

What matters here is not so much the technicality of the constitutional procedure as the overriding need for creating a tension-free atmosphere that would be conducive to the holding of a fair vote. The ease with which the two leading parties agreed on a chief election commissioner should serve as a model in other matters, including the choice of caretaker prime minister. For that reason, the opposition should respond positively to Prime Minister Raja Pervez Ashraf’s offer of dialogue. Mr Ashraf said the aim behind his offer was to ensure an orderly transfer of power and “the supremacy of democracy”.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Rock and a hard place

The reason why the police turned their ire on journalists as Islamabad descended into chaos is not hard to understand.

Endangered temple

The white stripe on the national flag designed to represent Pakistan’s numerous minority-religion groups is ignored.

Comments (6) (Closed)


MAD
Aug 16, 2012 09:28am
I believe all parties (yes all of them) have agreed that rhetoric aside the parliament must complete its constitutional term. the rest is just posturing for the upcoming elections.
Musawar Massan
Aug 16, 2012 03:39pm
I hope a free and fair election, despite being crying on after results. Its time to adopt a collective strategy, where in next five year term should free from RONA DHONA at each other and blaming. BELIEVE IN POSITIVE PAKISTAN.
Iftikhar Husain
Aug 16, 2012 11:32am
It is high time that elections are near they must be done as soon as possible.
Taaruf
Aug 16, 2012 12:22pm
Present government had better go earlier for having elections. Neverthless, it has not done any good to people, yet it expects for smash success. The JUI and TI should welcome this move to set an interim government as present government can arrange new election.
M. Asghar
Aug 16, 2012 09:09am
It seems that in spite of many pitfalls on the way, the things have to move forwards in reasonable way for the caretaker set-up for the coming elections.
Zameer
Aug 16, 2012 08:38pm
Pakistan is a democracy in transition. It needs "strong constitutional institutions and democratic traditions" to achieve what's known as democratic consolidation. Only then the "supremacy of democracy" could be achieved. Anything short of this will be mere politics shorn of democracy, something Pakistani politicians have long been doing.