A photograph taken on November 27, 2008, shows flames gushing out of The Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai, one of the sites attacked by alleged militant gunmen. — File photo by AFP
A photograph taken on November 27, 2008, shows flames gushing out of The Taj Mahal Hotel in Mumbai, one of the sites attacked by gunmen. — File photo by AFP

RAWALPINDI: An anti-terrorism court hearing the Mumbai attacks case adjourned the hearing to August 4, DawnNews reported.

The court has also issued summons for five witnesses to appear at the next hearing.

The case was heard by ATC Judge Chaudhry Habibur Rehman in Adiyala prison.

During the hearing, the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) produced two witnesses but the court did not get their statements on record.

The judge reiterated that the commission constituted for recording in India the testimonies of four witnesses of the attacks was not allowed to cross-examine Indian prosecution witnesses.

The judge said that the commission's issue needed resolving before the statements of the two witnesses could be recorded, adding that, the testimonies of the two witnesses were linked to the prosecution witnesses in India.

Adjourning the case's hearing to August 4, the judge issued summons for five witnesses.

On July 17, the court had declared illegal the findings of the commission constituted for recording the testimonies of witnesses in India.

The court had moreover said that the defence counsel for seven suspected abettors of the Mumbai attacks — alleged mastermind Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, Abdul Wajid, Mazhar Iqbal, Hammad Amin Sadiq, Shahid Jameel Riaz, Jamil Ahmed and Younas Anjum — had not been given the right of cross-examining the Indian prosecution witnesses and, subsequently, the FIA could not use the statements of Indian witnesses against the seven suspects.

The court had, however, said the testimonies could be used by the FIA against the Pakistani accused only if the Indian court again allowed the defence counsel to cross-examine the witnesses.

The seven had been formally indicted on November 25, 2009 for planning and helping the execution of the 2008 attacks.

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

THE Iran-Israel shadow war has very much come out into the open. Tel Aviv had been targeting Tehran’s assets for...
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...