Double standards

Published Jul 14, 2012 03:06am

IN all the analysis of the opposition of right-wing parties to the reopening of Nato supply routes, one aspect of their reaction has often been overlooked. They have been criticised by more moderate quarters for their resistance to moving forward with the US-Pakistan relationship, for giving public space to violent extremists, such as in Difa-i-Pakistan Council rallies, and for being pawns of the establishment. But an ANP leader has now pointed out another feature of the anti-Americanism that is in vogue among right-wing political party leaders: hypocrisy. Where were some of these same parties and politicians when Nato supplies were travelling through Pakistan under Pervez Musharraf, when the US first attacked Afghanistan, when Pakistani troops launched their first operations in the tribal areas, and when drone attacks on Pakistani territory began? The Muttahida Majlis-i-Amal may have held protest rallies and in public made anti-Americanism a rallying cry even then. But it was also instrumental in enabling the pro-US Musharraf regime to survive despite the opposition of secular parties. Ultimately the same leaders who had made opposition to the ‘war on terror’ their election platform in 2002 also served as the saviours of a man who was America’s key ally in that war.

Sovereignty, then, is a mutable concept, useful for public posturing, and perhaps with some principles backing it, but ultimately susceptible to what is politically necessary. In the post-2008 world, religious parties have little pull in parliament and therefore less to lose. Taking up the anti-Americanism mantle as forcefully as they have can only pay political dividends, even if that means, for some of the former MMA parties, joining the dubious DPC. Already there are signs that the rhetoric has been adjusted in the face of political — and other — pressures. Perhaps that is why the violence that was threatened during the seven-month halt in Nato supplies never materialised when the routes were reopened, or the JUI-F did not walk out of parliament in protest even though the secular opposition did. The self-appointed guardians of national sovereignty are not quite as righteous as they would like to appear.


Do you have information you wish to share with Dawn.com? You can email our News Desk to share news tips, reports and general feedback. You can also email the Blog Desk if you have an opinion or narrative to share, or reach out to the Special Projects Desk to send us your Photos, or Videos.

More From This Section

Madressah reform

If 90pc of the madressahs are problem-free, then rest of 10pc, that still leaves thousands, do have a militancy problem.

Power breakdowns

The recent power breakdowns highlight the need to address power related issues, including transmission system.

Tunisia’s example

The victory of a secular-leaning party shows Tunisia’s commendable progress towards a democratic dispensation.

Comments (6) Closed




@munawar_bilal
Jul 14, 2012 05:14am
Rightly pointed out, all these religious political parties insist that DPC is not a political alliance but fact is that it is made for political advantages. During Musharaff's tenure, these religious political parties were real helpful for extension of his rule but today they have turned against him. It shows that majority of our religious political parties are hypocrites and dishonest.
Maroof Alam Kashkoli
Jul 14, 2012 07:17am
true!!!
akhter husain
Jul 14, 2012 08:34am
We have been two faced,so what is new about it.
r.s.soni
Jul 14, 2012 09:54am
sir, let the people of pakistan decide in next general election.
Dilbar Jahan
Jul 15, 2012 02:00am
Janus-faced they are, but public has a short memory. Thank you, Dawn, for reminding the readers double standards of the right (which is always wrong!) and the mullahs!
Afaq Yousuf
Jul 15, 2012 02:33am
Afaq Yousuf, right wing parties are almost unemployed so protest against the employer (US) is understandable.