kaneria670
Were Kaneria to be banned by the ECB, he could also face exclusion from senior cricket in other countries too. -File photo

LONDON: Former Pakistan leg-spinner Danish Kaneria was given a life ban from English cricket on Friday for his involvement in the Mervyn Westfield spot-fixing case, the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB) said.

Westfield was given a five-year ban, although he will be able to play club cricket in the final two years of his suspension.

In a statement an ECB disciplinary panel said: “We regard Danish Kaneria as a grave danger to the game of cricket and we must take every appropriate step to protect our game from his corrupt activities.

“Accordingly, we are unanimously of the view that the only appropriate sanction in relation to both charges is one of suspension for life and that is the sanction we impose.

“This means from today Danish Kaneria is suspended from any involvement in the playing, organisation or administration of any cricket under the jurisdiction of the ECB.”

The panel, who in an earlier statement Friday had labelled Kaneria a “liar”, added corruption was a “cancer which must be rooted out of the game of cricket”.

Kaneria's ban could all but signal the end of his career as most of cricket's leading nations, including Pakistan, have signed up to a doctrine of the “mutual recognition of sanctions” put forward by the International Cricket Council (ICC) in a bid to stamp out corruption.

But Bangladesh and Sri Lanka have not committed themselves to this policy.

Westfield was jailed for four months in February, but served two before being released in April, after admitting he accepted #6,000 to under-perform during a Pro40 match between Essex and Durham in 2009.

The now 24-year-old Westfield named Kaneria -- arrested with him in 2010 but released without charge -- as the link between bookmakers and players.

And the ECB panel agreed, saying: “We are left in no reasonable doubt that Danish Kaneria knowingly induced or encouraged Mervyn Westfield not to perform on his merits in the Durham match.”

In a damning indictment of 31-year-old Kaneria, the disciplinary panel said: “We consider that in many respects the evidence of Danish Kaneria simply does not stand up to scrutiny and is plainly lies.”

The panel said Kaneria had “made no admission, has shown no remorse and sought to cast blame on other plainly innocent persons. “In all these circumstances, we regard Danish Kaneria as a grave danger to the game of cricket and we must take every appropriate step to protect our game from his corrupt activities.”

Kaneria was found guilty by the ECB of two charges.

Firstly, he “induced or encouraged, or attempted to induce or encourage, Westfield not to perform on his merits, that is, to deliberately concede a minimum number of runs in his first over of the match between Essex and Durham.”

And secondly, he was also found guilty of bringing cricket into disrepute “by inducing or encouraging Westfield not to perform on his merits”.

Westfield was charged by a three-man panel chaired by lawyer Gerard Elias and featuring retired former England one-day international bowler Jamie Dalrymple with bringing cricket into disrepute, a charge the seamer accepted.

Explaining the punishment handed out to Westfield, the panel said that had he committed the offences to which he pleaded guilty this year -- when the education and training programmes put forward by the ECB and the Professional Cricketers' Association were in place -- rather than in 2009, “we would have imposed a suspension of nine years.”

They added: “We bear in mind the fact that his conduct occurred in 2009, that he was targeted and pressurised by a senior team mate.

“To the ECB's charge he pleaded guilty at the first opportunity and is entitled to significant credit for that.”

The ECB panel said Kaneria, by his own admission, had introduced Westfield in a nightclub to Arun or Anu Bhatt an Indian businessman who, prior to November 2007, had come to the notice of the Anti Corruption and Security Unit (ACSU) of the ICC as “allegedly being heavily involved in illegal betting”.

More From This Section

Ajmal given clearance for Worcestershire stint

“We have given NOC to Ajmal but want him to return in mid-July so that he can be part of team's tour to Sri Lanka.”

Ferrer knocks out Nadal at Monte Carlo

Nadal's 30-match winning streak ended on Friday when the world number one was upset 7-6(1) 6-4.

Trott stressed again, stepping away from cricket

''It is not fair on my teammates or myself to continue when I am unable to function at 100 percent.''

PCB advertises for coaches again

The PCB says it prefers to have a former Test or international player as the head coach.


Comments are closed.

Comments (9)

Sohail
June 22, 2012 7:29 pm
ECB should also keep eye on their own players.
Tahir Ali
June 22, 2012 4:38 pm
Shame on Kaneria, Shame for all Pakistanis. This is why you play Cricket? That too under the name of your Homeland? Just shame on you.
Gamer100
June 22, 2012 4:50 pm
That's four down one to go. I mean Kamran Akmal. Hopefully Kaneria will come forward on how the two colluded 4 months later in Australia. Go back and look at the Day 3 footage of Sydney Test 2010 after tea. Two dropped catches of Hussey by Akmal off his bowling, and Kaneria switches to round the wicket instead of keeping that line to viewers and commentators surprise. When Yusuf does not take the new ball and continues with Kaneria, he feigns an injury. It's all there.
sabir khan
July 4, 2012 8:33 am
i don't know what happens in Pakistan cricket team but if Kaneria play that is good
Joe Pashi
June 23, 2012 1:15 pm
I like the court using "liar" as a accusation. I wish to see this proof used more often in courts, as a pretext fro other accusations in a crime. Most crimes are a morality issue compounded with non-acceptable deeds.
soft ball player
June 22, 2012 11:16 pm
thanks GOD the ban did not came from PCB. Otherwise mr kaneria would have siad in media ithey want to stop him play because he belong to some other religion
Local
June 23, 2012 4:56 am
Beautiful. Five to ten years of imprisonment for the cricketers of a different nation (Pakistan), and just 4 months, for their own cricketer. I am in no way saying, that the Pakistani cricketers were innocent, or shall have been dealt leniently, but only demanding justice, and same punishment all across the board. Is it JUSTICE or JUST US? And what about the bookies, did they vanish in thin air, or they were from Mars? And went back.
muhammadanasabbasjamal
June 23, 2012 8:21 am
3 Pakistanis gets out of jail, ECB panel can't digest that so they attack on the 4th one. Unfortunately a good spinner career is now completely end.
Sanjay
June 23, 2012 8:24 am
one more pakistani crickter.....
Explore: Indian elections 2014
Explore: Indian elections 2014
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
How much do you know about Indian Elections?
Poll
From The Newspaper
Tweets