WASHINGTON, June 12: Pakistan’s former ambassador to the United States Husain Haqqani said on Tuesday that he refused to let his patriotism be judged by those who had endorsed martial law regimes and had even given the right to military dictators to amend the Constitution.

Responding to the Memo Commission report, which found him guilty of writing the memo, Mr Haqqani said the conclusion was “political and one-sided”.

“The commission’s report has been released to distract attention from other more embarrassing developments,” he said, alluding to the allegations relating to the Chief Justice’s son Arsalan Chaudhry.

Mr Haqqani said he had nothing to do with the memo and the commission might have come to a different conclusion if it had heard him out, which it did not.

“The entire proceeding reflected the political machination of ideological elements including the judiciary and had little to do with fact finding,” he added. “The commission has based its findings on the claims of one man, a foreigner, and dubious records presented by him, which were reinforced by an equally dubious exercise termed as forensics.” Mr Haqqani insisted that it was absurd to call showing the accuser’s electronic devices to an expert of his choice at the Pakistan High Commission in London a forensics examination.

He pointed out that the memo issue had been based on newspaper clippings and the Supreme Court had created the commission amid an orchestrated media campaign against him.

“The commission’s head bent over backwards to accommodate the instigator of false claims while denying every request by me and my counsel.” He noted that the commission was created as a fact-finding body and not as a trial court so it had no right to pronounce anyone guilty or innocent of any crime.

“Similarly, the Supreme Court of Pakistan cannot act as a trial court and must not abuse its authority as the court of final appeal to divert attention from the embarrassment of its politicised leadership,” he said.—Anwar Iqbal

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.